On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> (list-index list elt)
> Looks for `elt' in `list'. This is a possible extension for
> `racket/list' that would be kind of obvious with adding the above.
> [*3*] I'm not sure if it should be added, but IIRC it was
> requested a fe
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> * Finally, I'm also adding a related function:
> `string-normalize-spaces', which takes a string and a regexp for the
> spaces, and turns all spaces into single ones. Same principles as
> above. This one is getting a `#:trim?' keyword tha
oh, cool.
I like easter eggs. This was no chocolate though. :p
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Dear Racket users,
>
> Many of you noticed that DrRacket v5.2.1 refused to launch today, March 26.
> We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience.
>
> The problem is d
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:01:16 -0300, namekuseijin wrote:
>> You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of
>> DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to
>> EN, as shown
image attached... :p
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:01 PM, namekuseijin wrote:
> You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of
> DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to
> EN, as shown in the attached image.
>
> I imagine most of you ra
You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of
DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to
EN, as shown in the attached image.
I imagine most of you racket devs don't deal with it, but for users in
other countries, it's midly annoying if for no other re
;.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:40 AM, namekuseijin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, John Clements
>> wrote:
>>> ;; NOW I'M A STUDENT:
>>>
>>> ;; only-long-strings : (l
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, John Clements
wrote:
> ;; NOW I'M A STUDENT:
>
> ;; only-long-strings : (listof string) -> (listof string)
> ;; return a list containing the strings longer than 2 chars
> (define/noloop (only-long-strings l)
> (cond [(empty? l) empty]
> [else (cond [(< 2 (
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> We spent 15 years trying to shake the name "Lisp", and today I feel
> proud to be a Lisp programmer.
according to the web-comic you're actually a useful-at-times
time-travelling nuisance... :p
___
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, namekuseijin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements
>> wrote:
>>> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to
>>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to about
> ~340K lines of C. That's amazing.
hope that doesn't mean more obfuscated C code, though... :p
_
For list-relate
11 matches
Mail list logo