Re: [racket-dev] `racket/string' extensions

2012-04-19 Thread namekuseijin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >  (list-index list elt) >    Looks for `elt' in `list'.  This is a possible extension for >    `racket/list' that would be kind of obvious with adding the above. >    [*3*] I'm not sure if it should be added, but IIRC it was >    requested a fe

Re: [racket-dev] Are There More String Functions?

2012-04-18 Thread namekuseijin
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > * Finally, I'm also adding a related function: >  `string-normalize-spaces', which takes a string and a regexp for the >  spaces, and turns all spaces into single ones.  Same principles as >  above.  This one is getting a `#:trim?' keyword tha

Re: [racket-dev] today's DrRacket problem

2012-03-26 Thread namekuseijin
oh, cool. I like easter eggs. This was no chocolate though. :p On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Dear Racket users, > > Many of you noticed that DrRacket v5.2.1 refused to launch today, March 26. > We sincerely apologize for this inconvenience. > > The problem is d

Re: [racket-dev] Issue with languages in Windows

2012-03-19 Thread namekuseijin
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:01:16 -0300, namekuseijin wrote: >> You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of >> DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to >> EN, as shown

Re: [racket-dev] Issue with languages in Windows

2012-03-19 Thread namekuseijin
image attached... :p On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:01 PM, namekuseijin wrote: > You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of > DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to > EN, as shown in the attached image. > > I imagine most of you ra

[racket-dev] Issue with languages in Windows

2012-03-19 Thread namekuseijin
You know, something that bugs me about DrRacket since the times of DrScheme is that it randomly seems to change the current language to EN, as shown in the attached image. I imagine most of you racket devs don't deal with it, but for users in other countries, it's midly annoying if for no other re

Re: [racket-dev] Simple loop checking in beginner?

2010-11-10 Thread namekuseijin
;. On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:40 AM, namekuseijin wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, John Clements >> wrote: >>> ;; NOW I'M A STUDENT: >>> >>> ;; only-long-strings : (l

Re: [racket-dev] Simple loop checking in beginner?

2010-11-10 Thread namekuseijin
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, John Clements wrote: > ;; NOW I'M A STUDENT: > > ;; only-long-strings : (listof string) -> (listof string) > ;; return a list containing the strings longer than 2 chars > (define/noloop (only-long-strings l) >  (cond [(empty? l) empty] >        [else (cond [(< 2 (

Re: [racket-dev] land of lisp, music video/comic/book

2010-10-28 Thread namekuseijin
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > We spent 15 years trying to shake the name "Lisp", and today I feel > proud to be a Lisp programmer. according to the web-comic you're actually a useful-at-times time-travelling nuisance... :p ___

Re: [racket-dev] relative lines of C in gracket vs. gracket2

2010-10-28 Thread namekuseijin
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, namekuseijin wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements >> wrote: >>> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to >>

Re: [racket-dev] relative lines of C in gracket vs. gracket2

2010-10-28 Thread namekuseijin
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements wrote: > So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to about > ~340K lines of C. That's amazing. hope that doesn't mean more obfuscated C code, though... :p _ For list-relate