Hi,
i guess this shouldn't happen:
$ cat s.cc
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
printf(%zu\n, sizeof(bool));
}
$ g++ s.cc -o s
$ ./s
1
Welcome to Racket v6.0.0.5.
- (require ffi/unsafe)
- (ctype-sizeof _bool)
4
Tested with multiple unix/linux OS, all gcc 4.3.4
Tobias
Yes, `_bool` is a problem. I'll add a `_stdbool` that corresponds to
`bool` from C99's stdbool.h, which I imagine must be the same as
`bool` in C++.
At Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:56:18 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
Hi,
i guess this shouldn't happen:
$ cat s.cc
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
Just checked and _Bool is also 1 byte, same as C++. What i don't
understand yet is to which standard does the current _bool conform? I
couldn't find any platform with int sized bool.
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:10:30 +0200, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
Yes, `_bool` is a problem.
The current `_bool` is pre-standard. It specifically reflects (I think)
the absence of a bool type in libffi, which in turn is an artifact (I
assume) of `bool` not existing in a C standard before C99.
Lots of libraries have a bool variant that is `int`-sized, so I
imagine that's where the
4 matches
Mail list logo
