Re: [racket-dev] for/first and multiple values
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On 8/29/10 8:27 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: What do you propose for/first should return if the set s is empty? #f? Which will do what in a 2-valued context? --Carl _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] for/first and multiple values
On 8/29/10 8:33 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, David Van Horndvanh...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On 8/29/10 8:27 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote: What do you propose for/first should return if the set s is empty? #f? Which will do what in a 2-valued context? Blow up I suppose. I don't care; I'm not going to use for/first with an empty set. David _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev