Re: [racket-dev] for/first and multiple values

2010-08-29 Thread Carl Eastlund
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
 On 8/29/10 8:27 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:

 What do you propose for/first should return if the set s is empty?

 #f?

Which will do what in a 2-valued context?

--Carl
_
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev


Re: [racket-dev] for/first and multiple values

2010-08-29 Thread David Van Horn

On 8/29/10 8:33 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:32 PM, David Van Horndvanh...@ccs.neu.edu  wrote:

On 8/29/10 8:27 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:


What do you propose for/first should return if the set s is empty?


#f?


Which will do what in a 2-valued context?


Blow up I suppose.  I don't care; I'm not going to use for/first with an 
empty set.


David
_
 For list-related administrative tasks:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev