On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 12:50:49 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>> > Should queues also be streams or just sequences?
>>
>> I didn't think about this: if you think they should also be streams,
>
While we're on the subject, I see I re-indented Carl's test cases.
That was an accident and I'm sorry; I didn't mean to.
Robby
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I think these queues are not streams, because they're imperative. That
is, the intent is that `stream-first' and `stream-rest' are functional.
At Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:28:33 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> Oh, I'm not sure. I just picked sequences to fit into for loops.
> (Indeed, the code was mostly
Oh, I'm not sure. I just picked sequences to fit into for loops.
(Indeed, the code was mostly there already, I just stuck it on the
struct.)
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 12:50:49 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Asumu Takik
On 2012-11-21 12:50:49 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> > Should queues also be streams or just sequences?
>
> I didn't think about this: if you think they should also be streams,
> that's okay with me. I'm not really sure of the benefits.
I
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
>> | [...]
>> |
>> | - make queues be sequences directly (and use make-do-sequence
>> | to implement in-queue instead of building a list)
>
> Should queues also be streams or just sequences?
I didn't think about this: if you think they sho
On 2012-11-21 12:10:10 -0500, ro...@racket-lang.org wrote:
> 9863366 Robby Findler 2012-11-21 07:29
> :
> | extend data/queue library
Nice!
> | [...]
> |
> | - make queues be sequences directly (and use make-do-sequence
> | to implement in-queue instead of building a list)
Should queues also
7 matches
Mail list logo
