Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Profiling mostly macro-generated definitions?

2012-09-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:35:12 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Sorry that I've been slow to catch on in this thread... > > Yes, stack traces in JIT mode don't really work in Win64, and that's > why `profile' gives no information. I'll try to improve Win64 context > support sometime soon. I forgot to

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Profiling mostly macro-generated definitions?

2012-08-31 Thread Matthew Flatt
Sorry that I've been slow to catch on in this thread... Yes, stack traces in JIT mode don't really work in Win64, and that's why `profile' gives no information. I'll try to improve Win64 context support sometime soon. At Fri, 31 Aug 2012 07:05:14 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > >> I believe I'm usi

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Profiling mostly macro-generated definitions?

2012-08-31 Thread Robby Findler
>> I believe I'm using the 32 bit build in all those cases, tho. Are you >> using the 64 bit one? > > Yes. Thanks. I see this too. Here's a shorter program illustrating the difference. #lang racket (require profile) (define (f x) (if (zero? x) (continuation-mark-set->context (cur

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Profiling mostly macro-generated definitions?

2012-08-30 Thread Antonio Menezes Leitao
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Antonio Leitao wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Robby Findler >> wrote: >>> Well, here's an example of it working. I don't know what to suggest >>> but to ask if you could make a small program that

Re: [racket-dev] [racket] Profiling mostly macro-generated definitions?

2012-08-29 Thread Robby Findler
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Antonio Leitao wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: >> Well, here's an example of it working. I don't know what to suggest >> but to ask if you could make a small program that illustrates it not >> working and maybe we can go from there