On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 22:20, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
for/set sounds and looks more uniform with the rest of the loops, no?
I disagree, I think for/union is a natural analogue for for/product
and for/sum. Both for/union and for/set should be in the set library.
union
Subject: [racket-dev] An Improvement to for/set
I've noticed myself desiring a for/set that would allow me to
optionally add zero, one, or more elements to the accumulated set
during each iteration. Is this something that other people would be
interested in having in the set library? If so, I can
I've noticed myself desiring a for/set that would allow me to
optionally add zero, one, or more elements to the accumulated set
during each iteration. Is this something that other people would be
interested in having in the set library? If so, I can send a pull
request to the github repo.
My
To: Racket Dev List dev@racket-lang.org
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 1:07:25 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [racket-dev] An Improvement to for/set
I've noticed myself desiring a for/set that would allow me to
optionally add zero, one, or more elements to the accumulated set
during each
4 matches
Mail list logo
