On Jan 18, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Two minutes ago, Noel Welsh wrote:
>> For posterity, this works:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Robby Findler
>> wrote:
>>> You can also set PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS to "-D" and then make install will
>>> avoid building the docs.
>>
>> This d
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:12 PM, John Clements
wrote:
> There are a bunch of comments in raco's main.rkt about absolutely never ever
> creating a .zo for this file. Does this call to racket create such a file?
I can check, but not till tomorrow afternoon at the earliest.
(racket-lang.org being
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> You should use something like
>
> racket -N raco -l- raco setup -D
Ah! Thanks, that also works.
N.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Two minutes ago, Noel Welsh wrote:
> For posterity, this works:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
> > You can also set PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS to "-D" and then make install will
> > avoid building the docs.
>
> This does not:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Tobin-
For posterity, this works:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> You can also set PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS to "-D" and then make install will
> avoid building the docs.
This does not:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> wrote:
>> % make
>> % make plain-install
You can also set PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS to "-D" and then make install will
avoid building the docs. Also note that on a multi-core machine "make
-j " works and speeds things up a bit.
Robby
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Noel Welsh wro
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> Well, that didn't work, but we've decided to upgrade to Racket anyway
> :) What's the equivalent process for Racket?
Very similar:
% make
% make plain-install
% raco setup -D
>
> Thanks,
> N.
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Matthew F
Well, that didn't work, but we've decided to upgrade to Racket anyway
:) What's the equivalent process for Racket?
Thanks,
N.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:29:03 +, Noel Welsh wrote:
>> I'm trying to build 4.2.2 without building the docs. I
At Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:29:03 +, Noel Welsh wrote:
> I'm trying to build 4.2.2 without building the docs. I thought I could
> just run make and then setup-plt -D, but make does not install the
> binaries. Looking through the Makefile did not lead to enlightenment.
> Any suggestions?
Does `make
Hi all,
I'm trying to build 4.2.2 without building the docs. I thought I could
just run make and then setup-plt -D, but make does not install the
binaries. Looking through the Makefile did not lead to enlightenment.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
N.
PS: FWIW, I'm writing a Chef (http://wiki.opscode.co
10 matches
Mail list logo