Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-26 Thread Doug Williams
That worked. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Yes, it's the ".ss"->".rkt' conversion yet again. > > I've pushed a repair. To speed things up, maybe you can try changing > the definition of `get-source-sha1' in "collects/compiler/cm.rkt" to > > (define (get-source-sha1 p) >

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-26 Thread Matthew Flatt
Yes, it's the ".ss"->".rkt' conversion yet again. I've pushed a repair. To speed things up, maybe you can try changing the definition of `get-source-sha1' in "collects/compiler/cm.rkt" to (define (get-source-sha1 p) (with-handlers ([exn:fail:filesystem? (lambda (exn)

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-26 Thread Doug Williams
With last night's build, the error message is now: cm: no SHA-1 for dependency: #"C:\\Documents and Settings\\williamsm\\My Documents\\Development\\madness\\madness.rkt" I am using a development link (using PLaneT) to reference the madness (which is an acronym for Multi-Agent Dynamic Network Simu

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-25 Thread Doug Williams
Sam appears to be corrects. If "No Debugging or profiling" is selected, I get the backtrace. If "Debugging" is selected, I only get the error message. And, most interestingly, if "Debugging and profiling" is selected, it runs correctly. Also, Robby's suspicion that it would run correctly if "Popu

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-25 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:22:19 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > > > It's worrying, though, that you're getting a DrRacket backtrace that > > covers "cm.rkt". Files in the main installation normally should not be > > instrumented for backtr

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-25 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > It's worrying, though, that you're getting a DrRacket backtrace that > covers "cm.rkt". Files in the main installation normally should not be > instrumented for backtraces. Does your installation have any "drracket" > subdirectories of any

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-25 Thread Matthew Flatt
The immediate bug is now fixed (to show up in a nightly build until tomorrow). It's worrying, though, that you're getting a DrRacket backtrace that covers "cm.rkt". Files in the main installation normally should not be instrumented for backtraces. Does your installation have any "drracket" subdire

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-24 Thread Doug Williams
I downloaded the nightly build version 5.0.1.1--2010-07-23(57d3dd7df753abacc8642809216a873962204d4f/a) [3m] and the error message is now: ..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files\Racket\collects\compiler\cm.rkt:94:26: cdr: expects argument of type ; given # and the backtrace is: cdr: expects arg

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-23 Thread Matthew Flatt
That version is after I improved error message, but before the repair. It looks like the nightly build failed last night, which is why the repair wasn't in the build. We're working on that problem. At Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:11:37 -0600, Doug Williams wrote: > I downloaded the latest nightly build (v

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-23 Thread Doug Williams
I downloaded the latest nightly build (version 5.0.1.1--2010-07-21(ca106a41343233e3e2e1d6393b97ff6de67e01c4/a) [3m]). Now I get the following error message: cm: no SHA-1 for dependency: (collects #"scheme" #"base" #"lang" #"reader.rkt") Doug On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-22 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:09:03 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I've pushed a change to the git repo that I don't think will fix the > problem, but I think it will give us better information when you get a > chance to try it. The new error message provoked a bug report that led to a repair. So, please

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-21 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've pushed a change to the git repo that I don't think will fix the problem, but I think it will give us better information when you get a chance to try it. _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Robby Findler
Sorry-- I should have been more clear: this looks like a bug and we'll try to get it fixed. Robby On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Doug Williams wrote: > Since it is autogenerated code, most of the time it is just run once (via a > shell call) and discarded - it's the results that are important

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
Since it is autogenerated code, most of the time it is just run once (via a shell call) and discarded - it's the results that are important and send back to the knowledge base. So, I don't need to keep the .zo files up to date. In fact, the only reason I ever execute the autogenerated code under Dr

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Robby Findler
Did you try disabling the automatic compilation (in the details portion of the language dialog)? My guess is that that will make the problem go away. (If so, you can also then start running "raco make " in the shell to keep the .zo files up to date and save on load times.) Robby On Tue, Jul 20, 2

Re: [racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
Okay, some more information. If I execute DrRacket with the Monte Carlo file, make sure Debugging is checked (in the Language dialog with Show Details), and hit Run, I get the error: string as 1st argument, given: #f; other arguments were: "0fe14e326dff1551df22271bdae03080a46dff5a9cd41e2f58a86ac8

[racket-dev] Can't Find a Workaround for Bug 11017 in DrRacket

2010-07-20 Thread Doug Williams
I seem have hit the same (or related) bug that Laurent Orseau submitted as bug 11017 (but in a completely different context that might help track it down) and I haven't been able to find a workaround. The actual error message I get is: string as 1st argument, given: #f; other arguments were: "c2