An hour and a half ago, John Clements wrote:
> Currently, you can't run the mongodb tests in DrRacket, because they
> use "subprocess" with (current-output-port), which (in DrRacket) is
> not a file-stream port.
So they should switch to `process' which does the necessary gluing.
(One thing I don'
On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I don't think it is possible with our current port support to make a
> port that goes into a text% and returns #t to that predicate (is it?).
In that case, I'll edit the docs to reflect this.
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
I don't think it is possible with our current port support to make a
port that goes into a text% and returns #t to that predicate (is it?).
Robby
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, John Clements wrote:
> Currently, you can't run the mongodb tests in DrRacket, because they use
> "subprocess" with (
Currently, you can't run the mongodb tests in DrRacket, because they use
"subprocess" with (current-output-port), which (in DrRacket) is not a
file-stream port.
In DrRacket's interactions window:
> (file-stream-port? (current-output-port))
#f
Is this expected, or should DrRacket's current-outp
4 matches
Mail list logo