Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket] Are There More String Functions?

2012-04-19 Thread Matthias Felleisen
I second that. On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:57 AM, Laurent wrote: > (sorry, I couldn't figure out how to reply properly from the list archive, as > I don't receive the dev-list emails.) > > One string function that I often find useful in various scripting languages > is a `string-split' (explode

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket] Are There More String Functions?

2012-04-19 Thread Laurent
(sorry, I couldn't figure out how to reply properly from the list archive, as I don't receive the dev-list emails.) One string function that I often find useful in various scripting languages is a `string-split' (explode in php). It can be done with `regexp-split', but having something more along

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket] Are There More String Functions?

2012-04-17 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I think `racket/string' should provide the useful string functions, rather than refer users to srfis. The only srfi/13 function I ever use is `string-trim-both' -- any objection to adding that to `racket/string'? On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > I saw no response to

[racket-dev] Fwd: [racket] Are There More String Functions?

2012-04-17 Thread Matthias Felleisen
I saw no response to this question and no commit that includes the cross-link. Anything? Begin forwarded message: > From: Asumu Takikawa > Subject: Re: [racket] Are There More String Functions? > Date: April 12, 2012 5:47:26 PM EDT > To: Cristian Esquivias > Cc: us...@racket-lang.or