Re: [racket-dev] Is someone doing the redesign for PLaneT? Explicit PLaneT package installs please

2012-02-07 Thread Danny Yoo
>> One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use >> programs with implicit PLaneT package installation. > > It will start with simple explicit installation only.  You'd also be > able to package .zo files and rendered documentation. Ah, I didn't realize that I sent my happy thou

Re: [racket-dev] Is someone doing the redesign for PLaneT? Explicit PLaneT package installs please

2012-02-07 Thread Jay McCarthy
+1 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > 11 hours ago, Danny Yoo wrote: >> One of the promises of PLaneT is that it makes it easy to use >> library modules without explicit installation. >> >> One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use >> programs with implic

Re: [racket-dev] Is someone doing the redesign for PLaneT? Explicit PLaneT package installs please

2012-02-07 Thread Eli Barzilay
11 hours ago, Danny Yoo wrote: > One of the promises of PLaneT is that it makes it easy to use > library modules without explicit installation. > > One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use > programs with implicit PLaneT package installation. It will start with simple expli

[racket-dev] Is someone doing the redesign for PLaneT? Explicit PLaneT package installs please

2012-02-06 Thread Danny Yoo
One of the promises of PLaneT is that it makes it easy to use library modules without explicit installation. One of the peeves of PLaneT is that it makes it too easy to use programs with implicit PLaneT package installation. --- Explanation: when I run a program for the first time, and I see a l