Re: [racket-dev] LTS Racket?

2015-01-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
Some of us have discussed this in recent months. So far, our conclusion
has been not yet.

At Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:56:01 +, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
 (Sorry if this is the wrong list)
 
 I just saw the LTS Haskell announcement, and it made me wonder if there is
 a racket equivalent?
 
 I've had occasion to use packages from older versions of racket recently
 and the ability to run quite old code unchanged is remarkable, despite many
 significant changes to racket itself in the past few years.
 
 The rate of change in Racket *is* terrifyingly but because of the
 remarkable backwards compatibility I'm not terribly concerned.
 
 Kind regards and HNY,
 Stephen
 
 Announcing LTS Haskell 1.0 | FP Complete
 https://www.fpcomplete.com/blog/2015/01/announcing-lts-haskell-1-0
 _
   Racket Developers list:
   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


[racket-dev] LTS Racket?

2015-01-05 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
(Sorry if this is the wrong list)

I just saw the LTS Haskell announcement, and it made me wonder if there is
a racket equivalent?

I've had occasion to use packages from older versions of racket recently
and the ability to run quite old code unchanged is remarkable, despite many
significant changes to racket itself in the past few years.

The rate of change in Racket *is* terrifyingly but because of the
remarkable backwards compatibility I'm not terribly concerned.

Kind regards and HNY,
Stephen

Announcing LTS Haskell 1.0 | FP Complete
https://www.fpcomplete.com/blog/2015/01/announcing-lts-haskell-1-0
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev