On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu
- Dracula Tests (confirm that Dracula runs from PLaneT)
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
At Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:57:10 -0500, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
- Run COM tests
Another repair pushed (for command-line parsing in MzCOM.exe).
It took me forever to figure out that MzCOM fails in a release
installation only because I install to a path that
My initial reaction to your message is that this is far too big of a test
case to hand over to someone else. Is there some way we can get you access
to a machine that demonstrates the problem so you can make something
smaller?
Robby
On Monday, December 30, 2013, Neil Toronto wrote:
I don't
On 12/29/13, 1:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* David Van Horn dvanh...@ccs.neu.edu
- EoPL Tests
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
We really shouldn't ship until this memory leak is fixed (which I just
reported):
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=14264
It's making writing substantial programs very difficult, especially in
Typed Racket, which seems to be affected more.
It's possible there's a weird
I assume you checked and it doesn't happen in 5.3.6?
Robby
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote:
We really shouldn't ship until this memory leak is fixed (which I just
reported):
http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=viewpr=14264
It's making
No, but that was a good idea, so I checked it. It doesn't happen in 5.3.6.
Neil ⊥
On 12/30/2013 09:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I assume you checked and it doesn't happen in 5.3.6?
Robby
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
mailto:neil.toro...@gmail.com wrote:
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91.0.900 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
- DrRacket Tests
Done.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Matthew B. has looked into this (I had emailed him separately about it,
forgetting that there was this message to start from) and reports that this
particular combination (putting code inside a blue definition box) isn't
supported well by the current CSS.
Is there a way to do something
Neil: have you had time to look into this? If not, then I think we should
just leave it for the next release. Please let us know what you're thinking
about this one.
Robby
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.comwrote:
Some plots in the documentation are missing a
I don't think there's anything I can look into. I can't duplicate the
problem on my system, and Plot doesn't do anything platform-specific, so
the bug is almost certainly in `pict', `racket/draw' or Cairo. Matthew?
Sorry I wasn't clear on this earlier.
(It could be that it's *possible*
done
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
(Re-sending with corrected URL for release candidates. Thanks to Sam for
the quick catch!)
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant
Some plots in the documentation are missing a polygon. I think it's
platform-specific, because I can't reproduce the problem.
Examples:
First example plot in 1.5 Renderer and Plot Bounds (look for a light
green rectangle)
* Neil Toronto neil.toro...@gmail.com
- Plot Tests
- Images Tests
- Inspect icons
- Math tests
Everything passes, except for the plots with the missing polygons in the
docs (which may indicate missing polygons on Windows or Mac OS X in
general) and the style issue in the plot
Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
* Mike Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de
- DMdA Tests
- Stepper Tests
- Signature Tests
Done.
--
Regards,
Mike
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91 release candidate build)
Even though Whalesong isn't on the checklist any more, here's a report
on its status:
I just tried installing Whalesong from Planet, and
On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
(Re-sending with corrected URL for release candidates. Thanks to Sam for the
quick catch!)
* John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org
- Stepper Tests
Done.
Updates:
- Stepper Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.0 as
* Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu
- Lazy Racket Tests
- Lazy stepper tests
all pass
* Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org
- Swindle Tests
- XREPL Tests
- Verify PL language
- Racket Tree: compare new distribution tree to previous one
- Run the unix installer tests
-
* Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu
Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
- Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
compile fine (note that they're still called `plt' and `mz' at
this stage).
- Test that the binary installers for both work, try each
On 16 Dec 2013, at 16:38, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Kathy Gray kathryn.g...@cl.cam.ac.uk
- Test Engine Tests
Done
-Kathy
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
I don't understand what's happening. I install to ./racket-5.91 and I
go in to the directory and do:
bin/racket -t share/pkgs/web-server-test/tests/web-server/run-all-tests.rkt
and get the same error messages as DrDr. The stack traces all make
mention of the racket-5.91 directory, so I'm pretty
Should it matter that it says build failed for my platform?
Neil ⊥
On 12/16/2013 11:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
(Re-sending with corrected URL for release candidates. Thanks to Sam for
the quick catch!)
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91 release candidate build)
Search
Most builds failed in the most recent attempt, and we're working on it.
Meanwhile, you can follow the last success link to get Sunday's build
for testing.
At Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:20:03 -0500, Neil Toronto wrote:
Should it matter that it says build failed for my platform?
Neil ⊥
On
Okay, well I've looked quickly and I see it too and I also don't see new
files that I've added based on that contract commit.
I do see a commit that came about after my contracts commit
(5bae9773aaa2d68c71240b8d7b0b58f43fb21342) that changed relevant things
here.
I'll keep investigating, but if
It looks like reverting commit 5bae9773aaa2d68c71240b8d7b0b58f43fb21342
makes the test cases pass in the webserver. (I did this on the release
branch.)
So we still want that small example, but now perhaps we know where to look
more accurately for fixes.
Robby
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:11 PM,
Ah --- I think I see what I got wrong, and I'll work on a repair.
Here's a small test case:
(define f (lambda (x y #:z [z 1]) x))
(struct s (v) #:property prop:procedure 0)
(define f2 (s f))
(chaperone-of? (chaperone-procedure f2 (make-keyword-procedure void)) f2)
; = #f, should be #t
At
That commit fixes problems that affect the new contract implementation,
but since the new contract implementation is not in the release branch,
I think the commit should be reverted on the release branch.
I have a repair in the works for the development branch, but it's not
simple.
At Tue, 17
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done). Also, if you have any
commits that should have been picked, make sure that the changes are in.
(Re-sending with corrected URL for release candidates. Thanks to Sam for
the quick catch!)
Checklist items for the v6.0 release
(using the v5.91 release candidate build)
Search for your name to find relevant items, reply when you finish an
item (please indicate which item/s is/are done).
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
- DrRacket Tests
done except populate-compiled.rkt (which is currently failing and requires
more investigation to figure out what's going on)
- Framework Tests
done
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com
- Web Server Tests
These don't pass and have the same error that's here:
http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27931/pkgs/web-server-pkgs/web-server-test/tests/web-server/run-all-tests.rkt
I
Are you running with the right version? The contract change isn't in the
release build.
Robby
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com
- Web
At Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:38:32 -0500,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.0 as the most current version; email
At Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:29:25 -0500,
Vincent St-Amour wrote:
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.0 as the most current version; email me
to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such
changes.)
Coming soon.
Pushed. It's commit
At Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:38:32 -0500, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
- Racket Tests
- Languages Tests
- GRacket Tests (Also check that `gracket -z' and `gracket-text' still
works in Windows and Mac OS X)
- mzc --exe tests
- .plt-packing Tests
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* Greg Cooper g...@cs.brown.edu
- FrTime Tests
Interaction snippets (in the FrTime language level) no longer update, but
it's not worth delaying the release over that.
_
Racket Developers
37 matches
Mail list logo
