It still behaves the same. I can literally capture a screenshot of the
canvas at any point where only a portion of the pictures have been
drawn on it.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> What happens if you restart drracket and try the same program again?
> (If the double buff
What happens if you restart drracket and try the same program again?
(If the double buffering appears to come back I think I know what
happened.)
Robby
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
>> Why do you think it doesn't?
>
> (I'm assuming you mean: "What makes me think that
It sounds like there is also a performance problem there too. If you
don't mind supplying a program for us to play with to see if we can do
better, that would be helpful (but no promises ).
Robby
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
>> Why do you think it doesn't?
>
> (I
> Why do you think it doesn't?
(I'm assuming you mean: "What makes me think that it is not
double-buffering?") ...
I have a list of 15 thumbnail images of people and a function that
places pairs of them side by side, using above/beside to create a 133
x 581 image. i.e.
choose-and-show-pairs :
Why do you think it doesn't?
On Sep 2, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
> Why doesn't 2htdp/universe use double-buffering?
>
> --- nadeem
> _
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
__
Why doesn't 2htdp/universe use double-buffering?
--- nadeem
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
6 matches
Mail list logo
