No, I'm suggesting that while I think a real binding to cairo would be a
good idea, it should be based on the code already in racket/draw and that
the code in my library is probably useless. Feel free to use any of it that
you find useful, though.
Sam
On Sep 27, 2014 5:08 AM, "Antti Karttunen"
wr
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> Instead of changing my Planet package, it would be better to provide
> an FFI to cairo based on the existing one that's in the library you
> mention. I don't think any of my package would be useful for that,
> though.
>
Did I underst
Instead of changing my Planet package, it would be better to provide
an FFI to cairo based on the existing one that's in the library you
mention. I don't think any of my package would be useful for that,
though.
Sam
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Antti Karttunen
wrote:
>
> Another question:
>
Another question:
Would it be a big job to edit the bindings in
http://planet.racket-lang.org/package-source/samth/cairo.plt/1/0/cairo.ss
so that it worked with the current
(require racket/draw/unsafe/cairo-lib)
cairo-lib
#
?
I guess it's not just question of "deprecated names for Cairo functi
4 matches
Mail list logo
