On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Will M. Farr wrote:
Thanks, Matthew! It seems to build OK now.
I missed the implication of this, the first time around.
If I'm reading this correctly, it means that clang can compile racket, which is
awfully close to being able to run Racket using an LLVM
Two hours ago, John Clements wrote:
On May 9, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Michael W wrote:
Of course this is much more work than just getting racket to build
with Clang, but I wonder what the implications of a successful
port could be.
I believe this would be hard, and I know that others have
2 matches
Mail list logo
