On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case
too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change)
I just realized that `flatten-begin` actually doesn't care if the form
starts with a `begin`. In
Yes, I agree. I don't have a good suggestion for the name, tho. Sorry.
Robby
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case
too. Anyone have any
At Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
argument that flattens all the way down?
I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in
compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
argument that flattens all the way down?
I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree,
On 2014-07-18 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
argument that flattens all the way down?
I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in
compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all?
On 2014-07-17 22:17:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this?
I'm not sure. I was hoping someone else could tell me. :)
Cheers,
Asumu
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2014-07-17 22:17:18 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this?
I'm not sure. I was hoping someone else could tell me. :)
Ha! :)
Maybe there's something you might want to do with the
Hi all,
I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
`syntax/flatten-begin` library.
Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that would
recursively flatten `begin` expressions like the `flatten` function does
for plain lists.
i.e.,
(flatten-begin*
Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this?
Robby
On Friday, July 18, 2014, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the
`syntax/flatten-begin` library.
Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that
9 matches
Mail list logo
