Just a quick update. I now run racket pointing to a main collects dir with
only .zo files. It is working quite well!
Now I'm eyeing Jay McCarthy's archive code ;)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:04:32 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
It seems like the timestamps among just the .zo and .dep files will cause
us issues as well due to how Perforce works. When you sync, Perforce sets
the timestamp of the file to the time of sync. If I sync all of a Racket
distribution my file timestamps will not be coherent from Racket's point of
A few minutes ago, Dan Liebgold wrote:
It seems like the timestamps among just the .zo and .dep files will cause us
issues as well due to how Perforce works. When you sync, Perforce sets the
timestamp of the file to the time of sync. If I sync all of a Racket
distribution my file timestamps
To be clear, we don't have any steps between sync in perforce and running
racket. This is for end users who don't edit or compile source. It is
also part of a toolchain where Racket is just one optional piece and so we
can't really spare the time to build zos at this particular point. We
really do
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
(FWIW, it is not really wrong to consider this behavior a bug at a
number of different levels (why rely on timestamps? why does
compilation not produce the same thing each time?) and it is something
we've
We're having trouble with .zos. We trigger the module mismatch, probably
from old bytecode whose dependencies have changed: error on occasion and
I'm not sure why. Can someone explain possible solutions? We distribute
the Racket install and our own code with .zos and it works for most
everyone,
Is there any chance that the .zo file timestamps became earlier than
the .rkt timestamps on end-users' machines?
Users are better off with the .dep files. I think `raco make' would
use them, for example.
At Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:10:18 -0700, Dan Liebgold wrote:
We're having trouble with .zos. We
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Is there any chance that the .zo file timestamps became earlier than
the .rkt timestamps on end-users' machines?
Yes that is possible... we're distributing using Perforce, which timestamps
files at the time of syncing.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Dan Liebgold dan.liebg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Is there any chance that the .zo file timestamps became earlier than
the .rkt timestamps on end-users' machines?
Yes that is possible... we're
9 matches
Mail list logo
