Re: [racket-dev] new logo [and 1 more messages]

2012-02-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
An hour ago, John Clements wrote: Would it be productive to choose one randomly on startup? (That's avoiding the issue, since a logo is something that eventually needs to be a distinct thing.) Also, in case it's not obvious, a rotated and flipped version of the logo does recall the lambda

Re: [racket-dev] new logo [and 1 more messages]

2012-02-11 Thread Matthias Felleisen
Eli, with due respect, but I think we know where you stand. If my memory serves correctly, you have collectively sent as many emails/opinions as the rest of the people together :-) -- Matthias p.s. conceptual art is good art -- helga says so. In that sense, making people think about your

Re: [racket-dev] new logo [and 1 more messages]

2012-02-11 Thread Eli Barzilay
20 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: p.s. conceptual art is good art -- helga says so. In that sense, making people think about your logo is *very* good. This is not art (not in the same sense that you're using here). A logo is not art in the sense of making people think. Logos are

Re: [racket-dev] new logo [and 1 more messages]

2012-02-11 Thread Robby Findler
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: (They also have a bunch of additional features that are needed for making a good logo, which the r doesn't have.) I realize this is a judgment call, but the link with 5 bullets you sent seem to all be met by the current

Re: [racket-dev] new logo [and 1 more messages]

2012-02-11 Thread Stefan Schmiedl
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:00:48 -0500 Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: In that sense, making people think about your logo is *very* good. r: Oh look, they molded a r into the red/blue circle, because it's called racket. I guess everybody will get this immediately and most will