On Aug 12, Eli Barzilay wrote:
** The addition is *slow*. Very slow. I wrote a test program to sum
up the integers from 0 to 200 -- and I get these numbers (test
code attached below):
I forgot the attachment.
x.rkt
Description: Binary data
--
((lambda (x) (x x))
On Aug 13, Noel Welsh wrote:
I think this is incorrect. I read:
- When we provide APIs we lock ourselves into them
- The proposed sequence API is slow and can't be sped up without
significant effort (cf worldwide shortage of Matthew-Flatt-hours)
- We shouldn't lock ourselves into a slow
On Aug 12, Jay McCarthy wrote:
[...] Of the additions I made, I believe that only seqn-cons,
seqn-rest, seqn-tail, seqn-append, seqn-map, seqn-filter, and
seqn-add-between will have the speed problem.
Side note: I read these as seq n this, seq n that, ... -- at least
to me, seqn works pretty
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:28:34 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
One thing about stability that bugs me is pushing changes and
extensions that are likely to change. For example, I'm worried about
Jay's push for a number of new
On Aug 12, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
One thing about stability that bugs me is pushing changes and
extensions that are likely to change. For example, I'm worried
about Jay's push for a number of new features as a
5 matches
Mail list logo
