Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread James McCoy
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 08:28:45PM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> I've pushed a change to the current git version of Racket that removes
> the 'planet' binary from plt/bin. (Note that 'raco planet' does all
> the same things and avoids the conflict mentioned below.)

Thanks.  I made a similar change to Debian's package for our 5.3 upload
to resolve the bug on our end.  I also added a note to our NEWS file
mentioning the future removal upstream and "raco planet" as the
replacement.

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy 
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread Robby Findler
I've pushed a change to the current git version of Racket that removes
the 'planet' binary from plt/bin. (Note that 'raco planet' does all
the same things and avoids the conflict mentioned below.)

Robby

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, David Bremner  wrote:
>
> Hi All;
>
> We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
> conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
> planet-venus.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685
>
> I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
> anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
> renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
> using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
> (alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-07-30 Thread Matthias Felleisen

It will stay 'as is' for this release. But we intend to deprecate 'planet' so 
that people begin to switch to 'raco planet'. -- Matthias



On Jul 30, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Doug Williams wrote:

> I have some scripts that still use planet. I use development links as
> a substitute for a local PLaneT-like capability and have scripts to do
> this for me. Some of these are on production servers. I would create
> an alias for it anyway, but would rather it stayed as is.
> 
> Doug
> 
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jay McCarthy  wrote:
>> The Racket core distribution has already started deprecating the
>> 'planet' command in favour of going through the 'raco' command and the
>> 'planet' subcommand:
>> 
>> raco planet ...
>> 
>> rather than
>> 
>> planet ...
>> 
>> The current documentation does not refer to the 'planet' command at all.
>> 
>> If users are still using it, then an alias would be sufficient, since
>> it is unlikely that programs (certainly none in the Racket
>> distribution) call 'planet' directly.
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Bremner  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All;
>>> 
>>> We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
>>> conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
>>> planet-venus.
>>> 
>>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685
>>> 
>>> I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
>>> anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
>>> renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
>>> using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
>>> (alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> David
>>> 
>>> _
>>>  Racket Developers list:
>>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jay McCarthy 
>> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
>> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
>> 
>> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
>> _
>>  Racket Developers list:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> _
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-07-30 Thread Doug Williams
I have some scripts that still use planet. I use development links as
a substitute for a local PLaneT-like capability and have scripts to do
this for me. Some of these are on production servers. I would create
an alias for it anyway, but would rather it stayed as is.

Doug

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jay McCarthy  wrote:
> The Racket core distribution has already started deprecating the
> 'planet' command in favour of going through the 'raco' command and the
> 'planet' subcommand:
>
> raco planet ...
>
> rather than
>
> planet ...
>
> The current documentation does not refer to the 'planet' command at all.
>
> If users are still using it, then an alias would be sufficient, since
> it is unlikely that programs (certainly none in the Racket
> distribution) call 'planet' directly.
>
> Jay
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Bremner  wrote:
>>
>> Hi All;
>>
>> We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
>> conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
>> planet-venus.
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685
>>
>> I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
>> anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
>> renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
>> using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
>> (alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David
>>
>> _
>>   Racket Developers list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>
>
> --
> Jay McCarthy 
> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay
>
> "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-07-29 Thread Robby Findler
I think it should be okay to remove it. All of the functionality is
covered by using "raco planet".

Robby

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:46 PM, David Bremner  wrote:
>
> Hi All;
>
> We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
> conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
> planet-venus.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685
>
> I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
> anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
> renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
> using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
> (alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


Re: [racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-07-29 Thread Jay McCarthy
The Racket core distribution has already started deprecating the
'planet' command in favour of going through the 'raco' command and the
'planet' subcommand:

raco planet ...

rather than

planet ...

The current documentation does not refer to the 'planet' command at all.

If users are still using it, then an alias would be sufficient, since
it is unlikely that programs (certainly none in the Racket
distribution) call 'planet' directly.

Jay

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Bremner  wrote:
>
> Hi All;
>
> We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
> conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
> planet-venus.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685
>
> I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
> anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
> renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
> using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
> (alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> _
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev



-- 
Jay McCarthy 
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev


[racket-dev] potentially renaming /usr/bin/planet to /usr/bin/planet-racket in Debian

2012-07-29 Thread David Bremner

Hi All;

We're currently trying to figure out the right way to handle a name
conflict in Debian between racket and an rss aggregator named
planet-venus.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680685

I don't use the command /usr/bin/planet myself, so I was wondering if
anybody could explain the likely disruption caused by (hypothetically)
renaming it. In particular is it likely to be somether where people are
using it from scripts or cron jobs, or would making a shell alias
(alias planet planet-racket) suffice to avoid retraining fingers?

Thanks

David

_
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev