Re: [racket-dev] safe version of racket/unsafe/ops?
You could put all the requires into one file and then re-export things? (At least for now.) Also, you can end up exporting too much, ie unsafe-call-with-current-continuation :). Robby On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:20 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote: On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Robby Findler wrote: I was thinking of something like this: (require (prefix-in unsafe- racket/fixnum)) (unsafe-fx+ #f #f) fx+: expects type fixnum as 1st argument, given: #f; other arguments were: #f Right, but there are lots of unsafe-ops (e.g.: unsafe-vector-length); if I'm working on a large file that uses racket/unsafe/ops, I'd like to just toggle it to racket/unsafe/actuallynotunsafeops to get better error messages. John _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
[racket-dev] safe version of racket/unsafe/ops?
I'm sure I'm just missing something obvious here, but is there a library that provides things like unsafe-vector-length that are actually references to the safe versions? I have a core dump occurring in (someone else's) unsafe code, and I'd much rather just import a different library than go through and take out the unsafe everywhere. I know that TR has such a library (mutatis mutandis). If it doesn't already exist, could I create racket/unsafe/safe-ops ? John smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] safe version of racket/unsafe/ops?
In principle I think it is a good idea, though I expect me and others will quibble over any name you pick. Jay On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:04 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote: I'm sure I'm just missing something obvious here, but is there a library that provides things like unsafe-vector-length that are actually references to the safe versions? I have a core dump occurring in (someone else's) unsafe code, and I'd much rather just import a different library than go through and take out the unsafe everywhere. I know that TR has such a library (mutatis mutandis). If it doesn't already exist, could I create racket/unsafe/safe-ops ? John _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay The glory of God is Intelligence - DC 93 _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] safe version of racket/unsafe/ops?
How about prefix-in with unsafe- as the prefix? Robby On Monday, September 27, 2010, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote: I'm sure I'm just missing something obvious here, but is there a library that provides things like unsafe-vector-length that are actually references to the safe versions? I have a core dump occurring in (someone else's) unsafe code, and I'd much rather just import a different library than go through and take out the unsafe everywhere. I know that TR has such a library (mutatis mutandis). If it doesn't already exist, could I create racket/unsafe/safe-ops ? John _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] safe version of racket/unsafe/ops?
On Sep 27, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Robby Findler wrote: How about prefix-in with unsafe- as the prefix? You still have to specify the right set of functions, right? But yes, that's all I'm thinking of. John smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
