Much better indeed, but maybe there is still some redundancy left with
the `setup-collects'
option?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/metadata.html
Laurent
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
+1
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
(looks like I'm misunderstanding this option. Forget about it.)
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Laurent laurent.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
Much better indeed, but maybe there is still some redundancy left with the
`setup-collects' option?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/metadata.html
I had suggested a `multi-collection?' definition in info.rkt to
designate a multi-collection package, but I don't like having
`single-collection' and `multi-collection?' (e.g., what happens if you
define then in a conflicting way?).
So, I think it's better to define `collection':
* (define
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
So, I think it's better to define `collection':
[snip]
I think this is a definite improvement.
Sam
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
+1
On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
So, I think it's better to define `collection':
[snip]
I think this is a definite improvement.
Sam
_
Racket Developers
5 matches
Mail list logo
