[jira] [Created] (RANGER-1405) groups are not shown if exact user name is passed in search filter

Deepak Sharma created RANGER-1405: - Summary: groups are not shown if exact user name is passed in search filter Key: RANGER-1405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1405 Project: Ranger

Re: Review Request 56640: Support for using resource-matcher for filtering policies within a service if service-resource is provided in the filter

> On Feb. 22, 2017, 2:16 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > > agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/validation/RangerServiceDefHelper.java, > > line 115 > > > > > > "ret" is not populated for non-p

Re: Review Request 56640: Support for using resource-matcher for filtering policies within a service if service-resource is provided in the filter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56640/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 11:37 p.m.) Review request for ranger, Madhan Neethiraj

[jira] [Created] (RANGER-1404) Few HIVERangerAuthorizerTest UT fails with Permission denied intermittently

Yesha Vora created RANGER-1404: -- Summary: Few HIVERangerAuthorizerTest UT fails with Permission denied intermittently Key: RANGER-1404 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1404 Project: Rang

Re: Scalability - large numbers of users/groups in LDAP

Hi Nigel Jones, As part of incremental sync support for ranger, I was reading through MS AD documentation for memberof attribute. According to the documentation, it looks like memberof attribute value is not stored and is always computed on-fly from the member attribute of the group. In OpenLda

Re: Scalability - large numbers of users/groups in LDAP

On 22/02/2017 16:43, Nigel Jones wrote: Will raise a JIRA I just came across RANGER-1211 . this talks about optimizing user sync through an incremental approach. Can anyone help with a MS AD question The document implies that the memberOf attribute on a user is *computed*, which w

Re: Scalability - large numbers of users/groups in LDAP

On 12/02/2017 10:40, Zsombor wrote: If the performance of the LDAP server is ever become a bottleneck, I would rather see a dedicated/embedded LDAP server which is syncronized automatically from the main LDAP server. I guess, this could be more easily implemented than a complex partial synchroniz

Re: Review Request 56916: RANGER-1401 : Add consolidated db schema script for SQLServer DB flavor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56916/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 10:16 a.m.) Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Do

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-1401) Add consolidated db schema script for SQLServer DB flavor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pradeep Agrawal updated RANGER-1401: Attachment: RANGER-1401-2.patch > Add consolidated db schema script for SQLServer DB flavor

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-1401) Add consolidated db schema script for SQLServer DB flavor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pradeep Agrawal updated RANGER-1401: Attachment: (was: RANGER-1401-1.patch) > Add consolidated db schema script for SQLServe

Re: Review Request 56862: RANGER-1397:Error method name in the printed logs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56862/#review166343 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Colm O hEigeartaigh On Feb. 21, 2017, 9:

Re: Review Request 56864: RANGER-1398:Missing the settings for 'ranger.usersync.unix.minGroupId' in ranger usersync module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56864/ --- (Updated 二月 22, 2017, 8:22 a.m.) Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Ankita Si