Re: Requesting to add in mailing lists

Hi Cyrus, welcome to Ratis. You can self-subscribe to the mailing lists: https://ratis.incubator.apache.org/#community You can also join the Slack channel using this link: https://s.apache.org/slack-invite Regards, Arpit On 7/27/20, 2:03 PM, "Cyrus Jackson" wrote: Hi, I'm Cyrus,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - Release is in the right location - Verified signatures. checksums - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER ok - Source matches git tag, no binaries in source tarball. There are a few empty dirs in the source tarball but not in the source repo. Should be harmless. - Built from source, ran

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - Release is in the right location - Verified signatures. checksums - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER ok - Source matches git tag, no binaries in source tarball. There are a few empty dirs in the source tarball but not in the source repo. Should be harmless. - Built from source, ran

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty Incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - RC is in the right location - Incubating in name - Source matches git tag, no unexpected binaries - DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE look ok - Verified signatures and checksums - Built from source - Successfully built Ratis using the generated thirdparty jars > On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:27

Re: [DISCUSS] Ratis Thirdparty release 0.6.0

+1 On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, 23:53 Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > > Mukul > > On 03/06/20 10:59 am, Lokesh Jain wrote: > > Hi > > > > With RATIS-933 fixed, I propose to create a new release for Ratis > Thirdparty. > > > > I would like to get everyone’s thoughts on this. > > > > Thanks >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

+1 (binding) - Verified signature and checksums - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE ok - Built from source - Built Ratis and Ozone using the RC1, ran smoke tests > On Apr 25, 2020, at 4:02 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.4.0-rc1 vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc0

+1 (binding) - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE, NOTICE files present (year in NOTICE file needs updating from 2018 to 2020) - Verified signatures and checksums - RC Source matches git tag, no extra binary files. - Built from source - Built Ratis 0.6.0-snapshot with the third

Re: [DISCUSS]Ratis Thirdparty Release 0.4.0

+1 > On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:01 AM, Lokesh Jain wrote: > > +1 > >> On 16-Apr-2020, at 2:21 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> With RATIS-847 and RATIS-852 fixed, I propose to create a new release for >> Ratis Thirdparty. >> >> I would like to get everyone's thoughts on

Re: Slack Channel Invitation

Hi Ritesh, Looks like we missed responding to your request. You should be able to join the ASF slack using this link: https://s.apache.org/slack-invite > On Feb 11, 2019, at 5:55 AM, Ritesh Kapoor > wrote: > > Hi > > Will it be possible that I get an

Fwd: [MENTORS] Podlings download pages with issues

Ratis (https://ratis.incubator.apache.org/#download ) Links to signatures and hashes are missing Looks like we need to fix this. Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-823 > Begin

Re: Please invite me to the slack

Resending with your email ID included. > On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > > Hello, if you don’t have an @apache.org email address you may need to file an > INFRA ticket to get an invite. I am not able to add you with your @qq.com > email ID. > >> On

Re: Please invite me to the slack

Hello, if you don’t have an @apache.org email address you may need to file an INFRA ticket to get an invite. I am not able to add you with your @qq.com email ID. > On Dec 9, 2019, at 2:40 AM, mrly <1210746...@qq.com> wrote: > > Please invite me to the discussion of ratis on slack.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

Copying my vote from the Ratis dev list. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures. - Verified checksums - Source matches git tag - Built from source - Ran unit tests - Release is in the right location Arpit > On Sep 16, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > > The Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

Thanks again for rolling this RC Mukul. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures. - Verified checksums - Source matches git tag - Built from source - Ran unit tests - Release is in the right location (the URL in [1] is slightly incorrect I think, missing the 'dev' folder) 1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

Thanks for putting this release together Mukul. +1 (binding) 1. Verified hashes 2. Verified signatures 3. Release source matches git tag. Minor issue, not a blocker: pom.xml.versionsBackup files are present in release source. 4. LICENSE/NOTICE files look sane. 5. Built from source. 6. Ran

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.4.0 release

+1 for starting the 0.4.0 release. We’ve had numerous useful bug-fixes and improvements since the last release. Has anyone volunteered to be the RM? > On Jul 1, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh > wrote: > > Hi, > > It has been a while since our last Ratis release. > We have around 50

Re: Subscribe to List

Hi HuaFeng, Please send an email to dev-subscr...@ratis.incubator.apache.org to subscribe. > On May 6, 2019, at 2:41 AM, HuaFeng Yang wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

I also hit the same error when I build from source. > On Apr 1, 2019, at 11:31 AM, anu engineer wrote: > > Hi Tsz-Wo, > > Thanks for the release work. I tried out the release and checksums all > match. Also verified the LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE files. They all > look good. > > However,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

+1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk. > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow. Thanks. > > Tsz-Wo > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey > wrote: >> >> +1

Re: [VOTE#2] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

+1 On 1/15/18, 4:58 AM, "Marton, Elek" wrote: Hi, We got valuable feedback from the incubator mailing list an improved the proposed site according to the apache guidelines. So I start a new Vote to merge it. Please have a final look to the