Re: Please invite me to the slack

Apache has made a change where we can invite other people without apache email IDs into slack. Here is a link for joining the Ratis Slack group. Please try this out and see if this works for you. As Arpit said, we mostly use @apache ID so your mileage may vary.

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

+1, for the release. Thanks for driving this. -- Anu On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:22 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Thanks everyone. > > RATIS-407 is now committed. Please let me know if there are specific > issues you like to include. Otherwise, will roll a release later this > week or early next

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc0

+1. 1. Verified Signatures on Bin and Src Tarballs. 2. Verified DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE in src. 3. Ran the examples using examples/bin (nit the help on start-all can be improved a bit) 4. Verified that the new Release Manager Keys are visible and verifiable at

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.4.0 release

ear to > review completion):- > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/pull/25 > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/pull/26 > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:27 AM anu engineer > wrote: > > > +1, Thanks for the quick response. > > > > --Anu &

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.4.0 release

+1, Thanks for the quick response. --Anu On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:17 AM Arpit Agarwal wrote: > +1 for starting the 0.4.0 release. We’ve had numerous useful bug-fixes and > improvements since the last release. > > Has anyone volunteered to be the RM? > > > > On Jul 1, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Mukul

Re: Season of Docs 2019 (?), mentor is needed

I will gladly participate, Let us add ozone too to that list. Improving documentation is really important --Anu On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 7:31 AM Elek, Marton wrote: > > "Season of Docs is a new Google program focussed on helping to improve > the quality of documentation in open source

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

+1. 1. Verified the Signature. 2. Verified the Checksums. 3. Build from Sources. --Anu On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:04 AM Jitendra Pandey wrote: > +1 > > Verified checksums > Built from source > Ran filestore loadgen. > > On 4/9/19, 12:33 AM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: > > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

Hi Tsz-Wo, Thanks for the release work. I tried out the release and checksums all match. Also verified the LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE files. They all look good. However, when I run "mvn clean package -DskipTests", I am getting some errors. It seems to be complaining of some missing child

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

/11/18, 11:44 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: Hey Anu, No need for me to wait around. This is just for the new thirdparty repo -- not a release of ratis itself :) On 10/11/18 2:31 PM, Anu Engineer wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Can you please include R

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

Hi Josh, Can you please include Ratis-348?, it fixes a critical issue for Ozone. You might have to wait until the end of day to roll the build. Thanks Anu On 10/11/18, 11:26 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the policy you're

Re: Replicated-List example

For Ozone, it is very useful to get Replicated-Map completed and hosted as first-class object inside RATIS. That would allow Ozone/HDDS to take dependency on Replicated Map. Right now, it seems to be an internal Ratis only object. Thanks Anu On 8/6/18, 3:15 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: In

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log "LogService" proposal

+1, This would be extremely useful for Ozone too. Thanks Anu On 7/13/18, 1:26 PM, "Lokesh Jain" wrote: +1 Thanks Lokesh > On 14-Jul-2018, at 1:55 AM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > > +1 > > On 7/13/18, 1:22 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > >Hi all,

Re: [DISCUSS] version of next release (was Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0))

+1, on 0.2.0. The major consumer of Ratis (HDDS/Ozone) will take it with or without –alpha ( --Anu On 5/14/18, 2:24 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: All the issues are fixed now (Thanks Nanda, Tsz-Wo, Mukul) The only open question is the version of the release

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc0)

+1 on cancelling the vote and flowing thru with new vote one these issues are fixed. From ozone perspective, we can take the Ratis bits and run a full cluster level test and provide feedback on the next RC. Thanks Anu On 5/8/18, 2:16 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Hi,

Re: [VOTE#2] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

+1 --Anu On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:00 AM, Marton, Elek wrote: > Hi, > > We got valuable feedback from the incubator mailing list an improved the > proposed site according to the apache guidelines. > > So I start a new Vote to merge it. Please have a final look to the >

Re: [VOTE] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

Based on the feedback from the incubator thread, let us cancel this vote. We will fix all the issues and restart a vote by end of the week. --Anu On 12/30/17, 2:42 PM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Thank you very much the feedback until now. I extend the deadline of

Re: ratis web page

+1, great idea. I would like to work with you on this. Thanks Anu On 11/17/17, 12:55 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Hi, Is there any plan for ratis webpage? I didn't find any Jira. My proposal is the following: 1. I can create a draft site similar to

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2-alpha release

+1, Ozone would love to get the latest Ratis bits. Thanks Anu On 10/10/17, 8:15 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: It has been more than 4 months after the 0.1-alpha release. After that, we have some API change (introducing RaftGroup) and a few bug fixes. How about we

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release

+1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via CBlock and Ozone. --Anu On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" wrote: >Hi, > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can >start integrating ratis. One example is HDFS-11519. > >The