Marton,

Thanks for tracking the issues.  All RATIS-227, RATIS-228 and
RATIS-229 are new resolved and there are no more blockers.  Let's roll
a release?

Tsz-Wo

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Marton, Elek <e...@apache.org> wrote:
> Quick update:
>
>
> TLDR; We need RATIS-227/RATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0
> release.
>
>
>
> Current Blocker/Patch Available jiras:
>
> BLOCKER:
>
> RATIS-227 TestRaftWithGrpc.testBasicAppendEntriesWithAllReplication fails
> --> No patch, yet
>
> RATIS-228 Handle zero size log_inprogress file
> --> Patch available, seems to be ok for me, but not enough experience with
> the file writing. Please review if you have time.
>
> NON-BLOCKER:
>
> RATIS-229 GRpcLogAppender should trigger a heartbeat when appendEntries
> Patch Available -> but "need more testing". Seems to be a real problem which
> should be included, question is open about the implementation.
>
> RATIS-230: Improve gRPC log messages
> Patch Available -> seems to be ok for me, checkstyle issues
>
> RATIS-222 Handle Error exception when Unassigned Variable is tried to get .
> Patch Available --> I think it should be fixed in different location with
> fixing the error handling of the arithmetic state machine
>
> RATIS-218 Optimize heartbeating in Ratis for Grpc protocol
> --> Reviewed, response is pending
>
>
> Marton
>
>
> On 04/17/2018 05:35 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>>
>> I agreed that RATIS-227 is a blocker.  Let me ping Kit for fixing it.
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Elek, Marton <e...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fair enough, I modified the priority of RATIS-227 to blocker. Let's see
>>> if
>>> we can get it soon.
>>>
>>> In the meantime I created a preview version of the release:
>>> https://home.apache.org/~elek/ratis-preview (NON OFFICIAL ARTIFACTS!)
>>>
>>> And requested reviews from the incubator mentors. Hopefully we can start
>>> a
>>> vote at the end of this week.
>>>
>>> Marton
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/16/2018 05:31 PM, Lokesh Jain wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we can have RATIS-227 in 0.2.0 release as well. There might be a
>>>> possible bug which needs to be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Lokesh
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to