Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

2019-03-25 Thread Jitendra Pandey
+1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are
included:
RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in
my opinion.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:

> How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3?  Please let me know
> if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0.  Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
> >
> > I just have re-created branch-0.3.  If you already have branch-0.3
> > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.  Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > +1,
> > >
> > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey"  wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create
> the 0.3
> > > branch).
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.  Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> jiten...@hortonworks.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in
> 0.3 as
> > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> trunk.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Hi Marton,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>For Ozone, it probably needs trunk.  How about we move
> everything in
> > > > >>trunk to 0.3?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Tsz-Wo
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> e...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Marton
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > >  Bumping up this thread.
> > > > 
> > > >  I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone
> release.
> > > > 
> > > >  As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > > 
> > > >  What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > > 
> > > >  Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > > 
> > > >  Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks,
> > > >  Marton
> > > > 
> > > >  On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release.  How about
> we start
> > > > > preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > > >
> > > > > We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.
> Then, we can
> > > > > stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

2019-03-25 Thread Tsz Wo Sze
How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3?  Please let me know
if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0.  Thanks.

Tsz-Wo




On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
>
> I just have re-created branch-0.3.  If you already have branch-0.3
> locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.  Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1,
> >
> > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey"  wrote:
> >
> > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
> > branch).
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal 
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.  Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey 
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 
> > as
> > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>Hi Marton,
> > > >>
> > > >>For Ozone, it probably needs trunk.  How about we move 
> > everything in
> > > >>trunk to 0.3?
> > > >>
> > > >>Tsz-Wo
> > > >>
> > > >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Marton
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > >  Bumping up this thread.
> > > 
> > >  I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone 
> > release.
> > > 
> > >  As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > 
> > >  What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > 
> > >  Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > 
> > >  Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Thanks,
> > >  Marton
> > > 
> > >  On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release.  How about we 
> > start
> > > > preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > >
> > > > We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.  Then, 
> > we can
> > > > stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > >
> > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >


Apache Ratis qbt Report: master+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2019-03-25 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see 
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/

No changes




-1 overall


The following subsystems voted -1:
unit


The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
checkstyle javac javadoc whitespace


Specific tests:

Failed junit tests :

   ratis.netty.TestRaftReconfigurationWithNetty 
   ratis.netty.TestRaftWithNetty 
  

   javac:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/diff-compile-javac-root.txt
  [4.0K]

   checkstyle:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
  [60K]

   whitespace:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/whitespace-eol.txt
  [140K]
   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/whitespace-tabs.txt
  [8.0K]

   javadoc:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/diff-javadoc-javadoc-root.txt
  [20K]

   unit:

   
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/500/artifact/out/patch-unit-root.txt
  [44K]

Powered by Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org