0.2.0 release news

2018-06-22 Thread Elek, Marton
As you know the Incubator level vote of the release is failed due to a licensing issue. The issue is fixed and the license problem is solved, it's in Patch Available state: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-249 After it's merged we can start a new vote thread. Marton ps: I

Re: 0.2.0 release?

2018-05-04 Thread Jitendra Pandey
a release? > > Tsz-Wo > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Marton, Elek <e...@apache.org> wrote: >> Quick update: >> >> >> TLDR; We need RATIS-227/RATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0 >> release. >&

Re: 0.2.0 release?

2018-05-04 Thread Elek, Marton
the issues. All RATIS-227, RATIS-228 and RATIS-229 are new resolved and there are no more blockers. Let's roll a release? Tsz-Wo On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Marton, Elek <e...@apache.org> wrote: Quick update: TLDR; We need RATIS-227/RATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0 r

Re: 0.2.0 release?

2018-05-01 Thread Tsz Wo Sze
ATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0 > release. > > > > Current Blocker/Patch Available jiras: > > BLOCKER: > > RATIS-227 TestRaftWithGrpc.testBasicAppendEntriesWithAllReplication fails > --> No patch, yet > > RATIS-228 Handle zero size log_inp

Re: 0.2.0 release?

2018-04-23 Thread Marton, Elek
Quick update: TLDR; We need RATIS-227/RATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0 release. Current Blocker/Patch Available jiras: BLOCKER: RATIS-227 TestRaftWithGrpc.testBasicAppendEntriesWithAllReplication fails --> No patch, yet RATIS-228 Handle zero size log_inprogress f

0.2.0 release?

2018-04-06 Thread Elek, Marton
Hi, I would like to restart the discussion about a ratis release. 1. It's hard to find the right time to release as thanks to the continuous testing with hdfs/ozone we always have some minor issues/improvements. I would suggest to do a release as soon as possible and do more frequent