Build failed in Jenkins: river-qa-refactoring #1

See -- [...truncated 7105 lines...] [echoproperties] lib-dl=lib-dl [echoproperties] lib-dl.dir=/zonestorage/hudson_solaris/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/river-qa-refactoring/trunk/lib-dl [echoprop

Build failed in Jenkins: River-QA-solaris #84

See Changes: [sijskes] resurected revision 1407431 -- [...truncated 8887 lines...] [java] - [java] com/sun/jini/test/spec/javaspace/conformance/s

Build failed in Jenkins: River-QA-windows #75

See Changes: [sijskes] resurected revision 1407431 -- [...truncated 8893 lines...] [java] Test Passed: OK [java] [java] - [java] com/s

Build failed in Jenkins: River-QA-ubuntu-jdk7 #71

See Changes: [sijskes] resurected revision 1407431 -- [...truncated 8896 lines...] [java] - [java] com/sun/jini/test/spec/javaspace/conforman

QA Test suite refactoring.

Presently most tests have a lot of shared mutable state. This isn't helped by the setup(QAConfig) mutator method in the Test interface appended. An alternative might be: public Test setup(QAConfig config) throws Exception; This would allow the test to return another Test object, fully const

Re: Open discussion on development process

Gregg Wonderly wrote: I still wonder why it doesn't feel right that the test suite be in the same branch as the associated "release". That was a comment I made, not that it's a pressing concern, right now we need to focus on the ability of the harness to deal with concurrent code and reducing