River Container (was surrogate container)

2013-11-28 Thread Greg Trasuk
Hi all: A while ago I mentioned that I had taken work on the surrogate container over to Github to try out both git and a Maven-based build. It’s now reached an interesting milestone and I’d like to talk about bringing it back into the River project. Right now, you can startup the container

Re: River Container (was surrogate container)

2013-11-28 Thread Dennis Reedy
I'd suggest that you keep it on GitHub, or we bring that and Rio into River at the same time. Regards Dennis On Nov 28, 2013, at 1123AM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote: Hi all: A while ago I mentioned that I had taken work on the surrogate container over to Github to try out

Re: River Container (was surrogate container)

2013-11-28 Thread Greg Trasuk
I’m all for bringing Rio in at the same time! It’s good to have choices. Is the code provenance clear? I think we can all agree that telling anyone to start writing services using only the JTSK is cruel and unusual punishment. In the same way that someone who wants to write a servlet does

Re: River Container (was surrogate container)

2013-11-28 Thread Greg Trasuk
On Nov 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Dennis Reedy dennis.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 28, 2013, at 1159AM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote: I’m all for bringing Rio in at the same time! It’s good to have choices. Perhaps what we should also focus on is to create (or move

Re: River Container (was surrogate container)

2013-11-28 Thread Dennis Reedy
On Nov 28, 2013, at 244PM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote: On Nov 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Dennis Reedy dennis.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 28, 2013, at 1159AM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote: I’m all for bringing Rio in at the same time! It’s good to have