My sense is that it is overly negative. I think that we made great
progress on agreeing on a new direction, getting beyond some of the
deadlocks that were holding back development, new look and feel for the
site, etc. It is also significant that committers were added.
It will take a while to
My first impression is too much technical detail. Also we had a request
from a board member last month "It would be helpful if you could expand
a little (a couple of sentences is fine) on the discussions for future
directions in your next report.". That needs to be easily identifiable
in the
https://dzone.com/articles/whats-new-in-owasp-apis-and-mitigation
Sent from my Samsung device.
Hi River folks,
Draft board report for May, please make suggestions, remember this is
only my point of view, if yours differs please say so. It's probably a
bit wordy, so could use improvement, but I want to be honest with the
board about the current state of development.
Regards,
Peter.
