Thanks Roy, I'll keep that in mind.
On 16/02/2022 3:15 am, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 15, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Peter Firmstone
wrote:
I think the PMC has already decided River's fate, and I tend to agree with
their decision, the problem is that historically, it hasn't been possible to
Some final thoughts on using OSGi with Jini.
https://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=202304
This was always a contentious issue historically on Jini lists, I expect
there will be vastly differing opinions on the subject, so I haven't
made any decisions that would constrain
Hi Michał,
I didn't take it personal, and don't expect you to take it personal
either when I say, I'm pretty sure everyone here is aware of River /
Jini limitations.
Anyway River has been a lot of fun, all the best for the future
everyone, hope to see you around from time to time.
Cheers,
Hi Peter,
> On 16 Feb 2022, at 10:01, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
> Inline below.
>
> On 16/02/2022 5:24 pm, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 Feb 2022, at 04:25, Peter Firmstone
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From the CodebaseAccessor service.
>>>
>>> The CodebaseAccessor proxy (local code) is passed
Hi Michał,
Inline below.
On 16/02/2022 5:24 pm, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
On 16 Feb 2022, at 04:25, Peter Firmstone wrote:
From the CodebaseAccessor service.
The CodebaseAccessor proxy (local code) is passed as a parameter along with a
MarshalledInstance of the proxy, by ProxySerializer to
