.
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 16 Jun 2011 03:37, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Is anyone else getting expired certificates with jtreg qa tests? This
seems to be the cause for a number of test failures I'm getting
Is anyone else getting expired certificates with jtreg qa tests? This
seems to be the cause for a number of test failures I'm getting in jtreg.
Is someone able to run the jtreg tests and post the result?
Much appreciated,
Peter.
Test 115: TestEndpoint$TestNewRequest: Right server principal
?
No problem if you do, I've got some uncommitted stuff myself to put in.
Cheers,
Tom
On 13 Jun 2011 06:59, Peter Firmstone (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Peter Firmstone
Peter Firmstone wrote:
_Unicast Discovery v2 - Unmarshalling Attack with Registrar proxy._
During unicast discovery, we have the option of using SSL, Kerberos or
x500 discovery implementations, unfortunately, if the unicast
discovery implementation being used doesn't comply with constraints
what they're downloading an don't want
to pay the perf costs etc?
I hope so, haven't considered configuration at this stage.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 11 Jun 2011 20:49, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Dan Creswell wrote:
On 8 June 2011 05:31, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote
Dan Creswell wrote:
On 8 June 2011 05:31, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Phoenix wakes (Activates) up a Service when it's required on the server
side. I haven't thought of a good name for it, but unlike Phoenix, the
concept is to perform discovery, lookup and execute smart proxy's
---BeginMessage---
Phoenix wakes (Activates) up a Service when it's required on the server
side. I haven't thought of a good name for it, but unlike Phoenix, the
concept is to perform discovery, lookup and execute smart proxy's on
behalf of the client jvm at the client node, although I
Most on the list would be aware of the stillborn Isolates API, which
showed much promise fixing many of the issues the Java platform has in
supporting secure distributed code. EG:
1. Class Visibility
2. Subprocess Isolation.
3. Unmarshalling attacks.
Released with Java 5 (which is now
James Grahn wrote:
but I'd
appreciate some clarification as to what that objection is. I don't
believe that any annotations or fancier tools will be necessary.
Are you suggesting type safety is NOT a necessary language feature in
distributed code?
By adding a Generic JavaSpace API to
Sorry for not being of much assistance recently, River is a tough
release, I'll make some time to help tomorrow. Tom has been battling on
his own here, keeping the ship on course. Don't worry, I had to throw
away my first release artifacts too. A sterling effort.
Cheers,
Peter.
Jukka
artifacts, this is what peer reviews are
for! A man who has never made a mistake, has never made anything.
On 2 Jun 2011 10:27, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Sorry for not being of much assistance recently, River is a tough
release, I'll make some time to help tomorrow. Tom has been
James Grahn wrote:
What is the bigger picture you're concerned with?
Reliability, developers experiencing unexpected run time errors and
compatibility issues in deployed code when using Generics in Service API.
In our earlier discussions I provided an example of how generics can
remain
The argument for generics in remote interfaces is to reduce boilerplate
code, the argument against is, it introduces unchecked type casts. (See
earlier discussion)
Is there another way to reduce the boilerplate code, using annotations
perhaps?
Or perhaps generics in combination with an
I believe an annotation that flags ASM to post process the byte code
to add runtime type safety checks would do the trick.|
Then we can say, yes Generics are supported in remote code, you just
need to add this @RuntimeServiceCheck annotation.
Perhaps one of the following annotions:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 5/21/2011 4:21 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
4. Have all committers add their signatures to the Keys file.
...
Do I need to get into the Apache web of trust? If so, any suggestions
for how to do it? I live in San Diego, but will be in London for a
couple
Good job Tom, I wouldn't worry about the alarm bells bit, I think people
are still active behind the scenes, or thinking about what needs to
happen next. I'll get back into it soon too.
Cheers,
Peter.
Tom Hobbs wrote:
Comments always welcome, due date is 18th March.
Below is the April
Greg Trasuk wrote:
Hi folks:
I'm hoping to get back to some hard-core River Surrogate development in
the next few weeks, and I've run into a problem:
On my development machine I still have a working directory pointed at
the incubator river repository. And I just realized that I have some
For people who don't know TeX, it might be possible to use Lyx?
Peter.
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 3/9/2011 11:16 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Hi Patricia,
The basic rule is, if you're the first person doing it, then you get
to chose. And as you say, the result will be in a format that
everyone can
I think someone also mentioned TestNG, which sounded promising, I was
happy to convert my junit tests, although I haven't done so yet.
Cheers,
Peter.
Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 13:11, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm converting my own informal tests of my FastList implementation
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Thanks for your comments.
I realized I made a mistake when I had to reboot the VirtualBox, and
the second failure was also with the OpenJDK Client VM. I'm rerunning
the test now, but it is one failure every few hours.
On 2/16/2011 8:32 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote
Preferred classes are used for the proxy's currently, the jsk-dl.jar in
our current build is included in proxy codebase annotations, this is to
ensure that com.sun.* namespace implementation classes are loaded by the
proxy ClassLoader.
In the modular build, we have a dependency relationship
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 11-02-11 13:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
Holding a formal vote as a way of discovering (e.g. spelunking,
humorously) whether a consensus exists is fine. My point, such as it
was, is that once you have a supply of -1 votes, you're really done.
501 - 522 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
