[RESULT] Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-11-07 Thread Peter Firmstone
The vote passes with 4 binding and 1 non binding: +1 Dan Rollo +1 Dennis Reedy +1 Phillip Rhodes (non binding) +1 Bryan Thompson +1 Peter Firmstone Regards, Peter. On 10/15/2020 12:12 AM, danro...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Oct 14, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Dennis Reedy wrote: +1 On Oct 12,

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-14 Thread danrollo
+1 > On Oct 14, 2020, at 8:57 AM, Dennis Reedy wrote: > > +1 > >>> On Oct 12, 2020, at 10:23 PM, Phillip Rhodes >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:03 PM Peter Firmstone >>> wrote: >>> >>> Currently the trunk branch is a stable branch, it is not for development >>> code, let's

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-14 Thread Dennis Reedy
+1 > On Oct 12, 2020, at 10:23 PM, Phillip Rhodes > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:03 PM Peter Firmstone > wrote: >> >> Currently the trunk branch is a stable branch, it is not for development >> code, let's make it so we can develop in trunk. The vote concludes in >> two weeks. > >

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-12 Thread Phillip Rhodes
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:03 PM Peter Firmstone wrote: > > Currently the trunk branch is a stable branch, it is not for development > code, let's make it so we can develop in trunk. The vote concludes in > two weeks. +1 (non-binding) from me Phil

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-10 Thread Bryan Thompson
+1. It sounds like this addresses concerns for moving to GitHub. Question: will this help people to find the right development environment or do we need to do something more to enable that? On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 15:10 Peter Firmstone wrote: > Some additional rationale: > > The original

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-10 Thread Peter Firmstone
Some additional rationale: The original reason some people wanted a stable trunk branch was they were concerned about the pace of development moving too fast, clearly that's no longer a problem, now the stable development branch has become an impediment as people on github can't see the

Re: [VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-09 Thread Peter Firmstone
If this vote fails, I will instead raise a Jira INFRA ticket to base the root of the git repository on: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/river/ Actually is that a better idea?   The negative is there are 11 forks of Apache River on github and I don't know what impact it will have. Regards,

[VOTE]: make trunk an unstable development branch.

2020-10-09 Thread Peter Firmstone
Currently the trunk branch is a stable branch, it is not for development code, let's make it so we can develop in trunk.  The vote concludes in two weeks. +1 Peter. Rationale: The project needs to migrate from SVN to GIT. The trunk branch is the GIT branch, currently it's only read only but