ApacheCon North America 2020, project participation

2019-10-01 Thread Rich Bowen
Hi, folks, (Note: You're receiving this email because you're on the dev@ list for one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) For ApacheCon North America 2019, we asked projects to participate in the creation of project/topic specific tracks. This was very successful, with about 15 projects

Re: Participation

2017-09-13 Thread Peter
Although probably not well known, River 3.0's remote method calls are communicated at native socket speed. I have considered writing deflate endpoints for JERI, which would compress and further improve throughput, one case against doing so is, when compression is used with encryption, there is

Re: Participation

2017-09-12 Thread Peter
Thanks Bryan, Be good to have a release to address the memory bug (no pun intended). Even better will be future binary releases based on Modules. Services built with modules are so much simpler. But so no one gets upset, all existing build tools, systems and conventions will continue to work

Re: Participation

2017-09-11 Thread Bryan Thompson
Peter, Just reviewed the release. My apologies for taking so long to get this done. It's been a busy time. Thanks for all the effort to pull this together. Bryan On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Peter wrote: > Anyone have some cycles to participate in the release vetting process? > > River

Participation

2017-06-16 Thread Peter
Anyone have some cycles to participate in the release vetting process? River 3.0.1 is a bug fix release. Remember if we're unable to continue this project, then we lose the ability to maintain River / Jini and we also lose the legal protections and visibility of Apache. Apart from modularity