Jenkins build is still unstable: River-trunk-jdk8 #666

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: River-trunk-jdk7 #156

See

[Result] (RIVER-445) Remove the Activation subsystem and JRMP support from the 2.2 branch

Binding Votes: + 1 Greg Trasuk +1 Sim IJskes +0 Peter Firmstone Non-Binding Votes: +0 Zsolt Kuti As such, the vote passes, and I’ll commit the patch. Cheers, Greg Trasuk

Re: Trunk merge and thread pools

Thanks Gregg, I was watching a talk by one of the vmware guys about optimising and correctly sizing server infrastructure and jvm memory settings for these different types of workloads.  The talk was on infoq.com Thanks for your ongoing support, I don't think I could have fix a number issues

Re: Trunk merge and thread pools

Well Peter, there are lots of things one can do about load management. The obvious solutions are visible in current load balancing on web servers. That simple mechanism of receiving the request and dispatching it into the real servers provides the ability to manage load with appropriate

Jenkins build is back to stable : River-trunk-jdk8 #668

See

Re: RAT reports

Does anyone how one puts a license header in a manifest (.mf) file? Patricia On 12/5/2015 8:12 PM, Peter wrote: Thanks Patricia. Looks like there's a number of policy files and scripts that need header files. Anyone have time to write a script to parse the Rat reports and prepend license

Jenkins build is still unstable: River-trunk-jdk7 #158

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: River-trunk-jdk8 #667

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: River-trunk-jdk7 #157

See

Re: RAT reports

I don't think it's possible, I can't find any examples. Peter. Sent from my Samsung device.   Include original message Original message From: Patricia Shanahan Sent: 07/12/2015 02:30:16 pm To: dev@river.apache.org Subject: Re: RAT reports Does anyone how one puts a