Re: The future thing

2016-02-25 Thread Greg Trasuk
I think it’s difficult to talk about future features without context. So it would be helpful if we could express in a great level of detail what exactly we see people doing with River. Perhaps even build a proof-of-concept demonstration and use that to drive any changes to River. Cheers,

Re: The future thing

2016-02-25 Thread Patricia Shanahan
Thanks for getting this started. I think you have a high level vision of where you see River going in the future. It might be useful to state it here. The costs and benefits of changes are best evaluated in that sort of context. On 2/25/2016 3:52 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: While we're

Re: The future thing

2016-02-25 Thread Bryan Thompson
Peter, This all sounds very interesting to me. I would also encourage the development of IoT examples along the way to help capture enthusiasm in a broader community. I think that this will all be much easier if we can break down river into multiple projects and move to a git-based process.