[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2

Hi all, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2. This is the first formal release for Apache RocketMQ Exporter. All changes since supporting Apache RocketMQ 4.x are included, as well as those making it compatible to Apache RocketMQ 5.x.

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* RongtongJin(jinrongt...@apache.org) Du Heng(duhengfore...@apache.org) ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang Cai(ca

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2

exporter according to the quick-start At 2024-02-13 17:53:29, "Gaoyang Cai" wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > >This is the vote for 0.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ Exporter. > >This is the first formal release for Apache RocketMQ Exporter. All changes >since su

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC2

+1, I checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.

Re:[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0 RC1

+1 At 2024-02-20 14:16:45, "jinrongtong" wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > >This is the vote for the 2.3.0 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. > > > >The artifacts: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.3.0-rc1/ > > >The staging repo:

Re: [D] Could the RocketMQ community publish the official images of Rocketmq-Exporter? [rocketmq]

RocketMQ Exporter is under voting for release, and you can find the official docker images as 'apache/rocketmq-exporter:latest' or 'apache/rocketmq-exporter:0.0.2' in docker dub. On 2024/01/12 08:39:37 "peachisai (via GitHub)" wrote: > > GitHub user peachisai edited a discussion: Could the

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0 RC1

+1 (Non-binding) I checked: [OK] check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if necessary [OK] extract the zip and check if the source version is correct [OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512 [OK] build the source, start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC1

+1 (Non-binding) I've checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. [OK] No

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 0.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ Exporter. This is the first formal release for Apache RocketMQ Exporter. All changes since supporting Apache RocketMQ 4.x are included, as well as those making it compatible to Apache RocketMQ 5.x. The group id of

[DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2

/v0.0.2-rc1 Best regards, Gaoyang Cai At 2024-01-16 11:31:34, "Gaoyang Cai" wrote: > >Hi RocketMQ Community, > >I hope you are all doing well. This is the discussion for the release of >RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2. RocketMQ Exporter has not been formally released yet

[DISSCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 0.0.2

to start an email thread to discuss the plan to release it. I will promptly organize the release notes. Kindly respond to this email if you have any suggestions or any important issues to be merged. Best regards, Gaoyang Cai

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

+1(Non-binding) I've checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the

Re:Re:Re:[RESTART][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC2

+1 (Non-binding) I checked:  [OK] check LICENSE, should be Apache V2 [OK] check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if necessary [OK] extract the zip and check if the source version is correct [OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512 [OK] build the source, start

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

Hi all, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0. In this release, accessing Apache RocketMQ from outside the Kubernetes cluster is available, the addresses of Name Servers can be set automatically, memory limit in container is

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

e is clear >> >> >> >> At 2022-09-14 09:20:09, "heng du" wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> I checked: >> ok check LICENSE, should be Apache V2 >> ok check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if >> necessary >>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

) Non-binding votes +1s: nize(k...@apache.org) The release will be published soon. Thanks, The Apache RocketMQ Team At 2022-09-15 17:07:15, "ShannonDing" wrote: >+1 > > >At 2022-09-13 11:25:00, "Gaoyang Cai" wrote: >>Hello RocketMQ Communi

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 0.3.0 release of Apache RocketMQ Operator. In this release, accessing Apache RocketMQ from outside the Kubernetes cluster is available, the addresses of Name Servers can be set automatically, memory limit in container is sensible so that

[DISSCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

to an official repository under Apache. For detailed issues included, please refer: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/releases/tag/0.3.0 Docker image for Apache RocketMQ Operator: apache/rocketmq-operator:0.3.0 If you have any suggestions please reply to this email. Thanks, Gaoyang Cai