[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0

Hi all, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0. This release adapt the RocketMQ-v5 client for RocketMQ-Spring. In addition, this release fixes some important bugs and make some enhancement. This release will put the rocketmq-spring

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0. This release includes fixes for many issues, enhancements to stability, and also introduces some significant features, including the million-level queue and the implementation of

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0 RC1.

The Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s,[1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Zhouxiang Zhan (zhouxz...@gmail.com) Rongtong Jin(jinrongt...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC2

The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC2 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Zhouxiang Zhan (zhouxz...@gmail.com) Rongtong Jin(jinrongt...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang

Re:Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0 RC1

+1 At 2024-03-01 15:15:55, "Zhouxiang Zhan" wrote: >+1 > >On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Gaoyang Cai wrote: > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 2024-02-20 14:16:45, "jinrongtong" wrote: >> &g

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC2

itHub repo is matching the current artifacts. [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start [OK] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct At 2024-02-23 10:31:35, "jinrongtong" wrote: >H

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC2

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.8 RC2 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc2/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1314

[CANCEL][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC1

There is an error in the rc1 version, so I will cancel the vote of rc1 and proceed with a new release of rc2. At 2024-02-19 09:53:18, "jinrongtong" wrote: The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1:

[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for the 2.3.0 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.3.0-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1310 Git tag for

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Zhanhui Li(lizhan...@apache.org) Yubao Fu (fu...@apache.org ) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang Cai(csgyt...@163.com)

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Zhanhui Li(lizhan...@apache.org) Rongtong Jin(jinrongt...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC1

, "jinrongtong" wrote: Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.8 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/re

[DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.3.0

Hi, everyone I hope you’ve all been doing well. We haven’t released RocketMQ-Spring in a long time. So I would like to start an email thread to discuss the plan to release Apache RocketMQ-Spring 2.3.0. In this release, Akai (GitHub ID: 1294566108) assisted in adapting the RocketMQ-v5 client

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 5.2.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ. This release includes fixes for many issues, enhancements to stability, and also introduces some significant features, including the million-level queue and the implementation of the jraft controller. The artifacts:

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.8 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1309 Git

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Exporter 0.0.2

+1, I checked[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.In addition, it would be better to update the copyright year in the notice file during the next release. At 2024-02-13 17:53:29, "Gaoyang Cai" wrote:

Re:[Vote] Release gRPC Go Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.1.0 RC1

+1, I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] The release note is clear At 2024-01-16 16:17:11, "Mad" <1094592...@qq.com.INVALID> wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > >This is the vote for 5.1.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for golang. > > >Apache RocketMQ

[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 5.2.0

Hi everyone, I hope you are all doing well. It has been more than three months since our last release of version 5.1.4, during which we have fixed numerous issues to enhance stability. Additionally, support for the million-level queue, RIP-66[1], has also been merged into the trunk. Therefore,

[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8

Hi everyone, This is an email discussing the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.8. Kindly respond to this email if you have any suggestions or any important bugs that require merging. Best regards, RongtongJin

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-69] Support MQTT 5.0 In RocketMQ-MQTT

+1 在 2024-01-10 11:37:52，"Ping Wang" 写道： >+1 > >Dongyuan Pan 于2024年1月8日周一 09:55写道： > >> Hi RocketMQ Community, >> >> Since the time for this RIP discussion has already passed, I’d like to >> start the vote for it. The proposal is provided below: >> >> Google Doc version: >> >>

Re:Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-69] Support MQTT 5.0 In RocketMQ-MQTT

+1, Looking forward to the support of MQTT 5.0 protocol in RocketMQ-MQTT 在 2023-12-22 22:05:22，"Zhiyuan Lei" 写道： >Great, looking forward to the support of MQTT protocol in RocketMQ 5.0. >Looking forward to the support of MQTT 5.0 protocol in RocketMQ-MQTT  > > >Dongyuan Pan 于2023年12月22日周五

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-67] jRaft-Controller Implemention

+1, I believe it is essential to enhance the abstraction of the relevant interfaces to achieve better adaptability with dledger and draft, and to ensure meticulous testing. 在 2023-10-16 19:38:04，"fuyou" 写道： >JRaft is an option for implementing HA in RocketMQ. It provides an >additional choice

Re:Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-67] jRaft-Controller Implemention

First, I must address several questions regarding your motivation for this RIP: 1. Firstly, DLedger has the capability of snapshot (although initially it was only used for Commitlog and lacked this feature, it has now been supplemented). RIP-59 has also started integrating this capability.

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

+1, I checked[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.[OK]

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Rust Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC1

+1, I checked Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts At 2023-07-28 13:51:47, "aaron ai" wrote: >+1 > >Zhanhui Li 于2023年7月28日 周五13:45写道： > >> +1 binding >> >> I checked license, source tagging, and PGP signature. >> >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 1:37 PM SSpirits wrote: >> >> >

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-66]Support KV(Rocksdb) Storage

+1 At 2023-07-20 16:15:30, "Qingshan Lin" wrote: >+1 > >On 2023/07/20 02:24:42 闽 wrote: >> Hi, RocketMQ Community, >> >> >> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 66 to support >> KV(Rocksdb) storage. Now the >> shepherds@gongyi-zmpand@hill007299are willing to >> support

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) Yubao Fu(fu...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Dongyuan Pan(dongyuanp...@gmail.com)

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 5.1.3 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.3-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1232 Git

​[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.3

Hello everyone, We have discovered a critical issue after the release of version 5.1.2. A recently merged pull request made adjustments to the initialization order of replicaManager, causing the automatic master-slave switching mode to malfunction in version 5.1.2. We are working to resolve

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [0] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) Rongtong Jin(jinrongt...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Gaoyang

Re:Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7 RC1

gt;At 2023-06-13 15:02:10, "jinrongtong" wrote: >>Hello RocketMQ Community, >> >>This is the vote for 4.9.7 of Apache RocketMQ. >> >>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. >> >>The artifacts: >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [0] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) Yubao Fu(fu...@apache.org) The release will be published soon. Thanks, The Apache

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.7 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.7-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1230 Git

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 5.1.2 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.2-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1229 Git

Re:回复: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.3 RC1

+1, I checked that Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts 在 2023-06-13 11:07:47，"L K" 写道： >+1 > >发件人: fuyou >发送时间: 2023年6月13日 2:41 >收件人: dev@rocketmq.apache.org >主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.3 RC1 > >+1 > >lollipop

​[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2

Hi everyone, This is an email discussing the release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.2. Kindly respond to this email if you have any suggestions or any important bugs that require merging. Best regards, RongtongJin

​[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7

Hi everyone, This is an email discussing the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.7. Kindly respond to this email if you have any suggestions or any important bugs that require merging. Best regards, RongtongJin

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [0] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) RongtongJin(jinrongt...@apache.org) The release will be published soon. Thanks, The

Re:Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6 RC1

be built success in the source package.[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct At 2023-05-19 14:22:12, "ShannonDing" wrote: > > > >+1 > > > >At 2023-05-18 13:34:25, "jinrongto

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/ The release artifacts can be downloaded

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1

The Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 vote is now closed and has passed with [5] binding +1s, [1] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) Yubao Fu(fu...@apache.org) Xinyu Zhou(yu...@apache.org) Bo Zhou(zhouboat...@gmail.com)

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.6 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.6-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1194 Git

[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193 Git

[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.6

Hi everyone, We have decided to release 4.9.6 in the near future. Kindly respond to this email if you have any suggestions or any important bugs that require merging. Best regards, RongtongJin

​[DISCUSS] Preparing for the Release of Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1

Hi everyone, I hope you are all doing well. It has been more than two months since our last release of version 5.1.0, during which we have fixed numerous issues to enhance stability. Therefore, I would like to initiate an email thread to discuss the plan for releasing Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1.

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-64] Heartbeat Optimization

+1 在 2023-04-27 18:57:20，"Ji Juntao" <3160102...@zju.edu.cn> 写道： >+1 > > >> -原始邮件- >> 发件人: "2017赵科" <464473...@qq.com.INVALID> >> 发送时间: 2023-04-27 10:39:36 (星期四) >> 收件人: dev >> 抄送: >> 主题: [VOTE][RIP-64] Heartbeat Optimization >> >> Hi, RocketMQ Community, >> >> >> As discussed in the

Re:[DISCUSS][RIP-64] Heartbeat Optimization

Hi @drizzle.zk IMO, the improvement can reduce network transmission and broker pressure in large-scale clusters, but can it guarantee compatibility, for example, when old clients connect to new brokers or new clients connect to old brokers? At 2023-04-19 11:01:30, "2017"

Re:[Discuss] Allow all users who have committed to RocketMQ to run CI without explicit approval

+1, It is inconvenient to need a maintainer to trigger CI every time. At 2023-04-12 14:50:07, "aaron ai" wrote: >Recently, Apache Infra changed the trigger policy for GitHub actions from >"requires approval for first-time contributors" to "requires approval for >all outside collaborators". The

Re:[VOTE][RIP-63] Queue Selection Strategy Optimization

+1 在 2023-04-07 16:45:22，"Ji Juntao" <3160102...@zju.edu.cn> 写道： >Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to optimize proxy(in >cluter mode)'s and remoting clients' Queue selection strategy. I have modified >the RIP document according to @yukon's

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5

Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5. This release fixes some bugs and supports bname in protocol for 4.9.5 client accessing proxy. More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at: http://rocketmq.apache.org/

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5

The Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5 vote is now closed and has passed with [4] binding +1s,[3] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) Yubao Fu(fu...@apache.org) Xinyu Zhou(yu...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Bo

[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.9.5 of Apache RocketMQ. This release fixes some bugs and supports bname in protocol for 4.9.5 client accessing proxy. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.5-rc1/ The staging repo:

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.5 RC1

+1， I checked [OK] maven jar in nexus repo is right [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts At 2023-03-27 15:44:25, "fuyou" wrote: >+1 > >aaron ai 于2023年3月27日周一 15:43写道： > >> >> >> -- Forwarded message - >> 发件人： lollipop >> Date: 2023年3月22日周三 19:34

Re:[VOTE] Release gRPC .NET Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.1.0 RC1

+1, I checked that Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts At 2023-03-17 14:59:39, "aaron ai" wrote: Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 5.1.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for .NET. Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis, and

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.5

Hi, erveryone If there is any other pull requests that need to be merged to version 4.9.5 plz reply this email. At 2022-09-20 21:05:32, "Xinyu Zhou" wrote: >+1 for holding the release of 4.9.5, give a chance for issue 3905: >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/3905 > >It's important

Re:[VOTE][RIP-62]Coldreadcontrol

+1 At 2023-03-07 14:55:05, "2017赵科" <464473...@qq.com.INVALID> wrote: >Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP​​[RIP-62] Cold read >control to support this feature. Now thei...@foxmail.com >is willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ-MQTT 1.0.1

+1, I Checked[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512[OK] maven jar in nexus repo is right[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifactsIn addition, it would be better to update year to 2023 in source package's notice file in next release. At 2023-02-24 15:02:45, "Qingshan

Re:Re: [vote]: Release RocketMQ Streams 1.1.1

+1 verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512. In addition, it would be better to update year to 2023 in Notice file in next release. At 2023-02-20 11:21:11, "Qingshan Lin" wrote: >+1 > >On 2023/02/20 01:51:54 Xinyu Zhou wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 9:16 PM Xiaorui Wang wrote: >> >> > +1

Re:[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.0 RC1

+1, I Checked[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512[OK] maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2023-02-17 17:28:38, "Zhouxiang Zhan" wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > >This is the vote for 5.1.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ. > > >This release contains some important new features, including supporting

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3

Hi all, The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3. This release will be aligned with RocketMQ Client 5.0.0 (remoting SDK). In addition, this release fixes some important bugs and make some enhancement. This release will put the rocketmq-spring

[RESULT][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3 RC1.

The Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3 vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s,[3] non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: *Binding votes +1s:* RongtongJin(jinrongt...@apache.org) ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org) Aaron ai(aaro...@apache.org) *Non-binding votes +1s:* Dongyuan

Re:Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3 RC1

+1 I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. At 2023-02-11 19:36:02, "柳尘" wrote: >+1 > >jinrongtong 于2023年2月6日周一 13:37写道： > >> Hello RocketMQ Community, >>

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1

+1 At 2023-02-09 16:04:54, "aaron ai" wrote: >+1, Nice to see it moving forward after the release of 5.0.0 > >Zhouxiang Zhan 于2023年2月9日周四 14:23写道： > >> Hi, RocketMQ community: >> >> I'd like to propose releasing Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1. It's been a while >> since RocketMQ 5.0.0 was released.During

Re:[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3 RC1

Hi All, the correct release notes is https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/02/06/release-notes-rocketmq-spring-2.2.3 At 2023-02-06 13:36:43, "jinrongtong" wrote: Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for the 2.2.3 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. The artifa

[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Spring 2.2.3 RC1

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for the 2.2.3 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. The artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.2.3-rc1/ The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1138 Git tag for the

[DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ-Spring 2.2.3

Hi, everyone I hope you’ve all been doing well. We haven’t released RocketMQ-Spring in a long time. So I would like to start an email thread to discuss the plan to release Apache RocketMQ-Spring 2.2.3. I’m sorting out the relevant pull requests that we plan to release in the next version

Re:[VOTE][RIP-60] Support Will Message In RocketMQ-MQTT

+1 At 2023-01-11 10:18:27, "Dongyuan Pan" wrote: >Hi RocketMQ Community, > >Since the time for this RIP discussion has already passed, I’d like to >start the vote for it. The proposal is provided below: > >Google Doc version:

Re:Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-60] Support Will Message In RocketMQ-MQTT

+1 At 2023-01-06 16:49:55, "Xinyu Zhou" wrote: >+1 Great RIP! > >On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 3:07 PM cserwen wrote: > >> +1 >> >> > 2023年1月5日 15:21，Dongyuan Pan 写道： >> > >> > Hi RocketMQ Community, >> > >> > Rocketmq-mqtt was developed to support the mqtt protocol to extend the >> > use of rocketmq

Re:[VOTE] Release RocketMQ Streams 1.1.0

+1, I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2023-01-06 14:08:57, "nize" wrote: >This is the discussion for the release of Rocketmq Streams 1.1.0 version. > >RocketMQ Streams is a lightweight stream processing framework,

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-59] Support DLedger Controller Snapshot

+1 在 2022-12-20 18:56:50，"hzh0425" 写道： >+1 > > > >| | >hzh...@163.com >| >| >邮箱：hzh...@163.com >| > > > > > 回复的原邮件 >| 发件人 | Jack Tsai | >| 日期 | 2022年12月20日 17:54 | >| 收件人 | dev@rocketmq.apache.org | >| 抄送至 | | >| 主题 | [VOTE][RIP-59] Support DLedger Controller Snapshot | >Hi RocketMQ

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.2 RC1

+1,[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2022-12-15 17:31:17, "SSpirits" wrote: >＋1 > >此致，顺颂时祺 >SSpirits >Email：ad...@lv5.moe >在 2022年12月15日+0800 AM11:12，aaron ai ，写道： >Hello RocketMQ Community, >

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.4 RC1

+1, I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512 At 2022-12-16 16:15:46, "Xin Wang" wrote: >+1 > >Qingshan Lin 于2022年12月16日周五 10:25写道： > >> +1 >> >> On 2022/12/15 02:51:00 lollipop wrote: >>

Re:Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-58]RocketMQ Streams improvement

+1 在 2022-12-05 20:19:00，"caigy" 写道： >+1 > > > > > >在 2022-12-05 19:37:51，"hzh0425" 写道： >>+1 >> >> >> >>| | >>hzh...@163.com >>| >>| >>邮箱：hzh...@163.com >>| >> >> >> >> >> 回复的原邮件 >>| 发件人 | nize | >>| 日期 | 2022年12月05日 17:40 | >>| 收件人 | dev@rocketmq.apache.org | >>| 抄送至 | | >>| 主题 |

Re:[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ Schema Registry 0.1.0

+1[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2022-10-24 17:24:21, "nize" wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > >This is the vote for 0.1.0 of Apache RocketMQ Schema Registry. > >RocketMQ Schema Registry is a Topic Schema's

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback

+1 在 2022-10-21 17:13:59，"fuyou" 写道： >+1 > >zhimin li 于2022年10月21日周五 15:38写道： > >> +1，We should focus on rocketmq itself >> >> > 2022年10月21日 11:49，aaron ai 写道： >> > >> > Hi, RocketMQ Community： >> > >> > We noticed that the existing logging module is unnecessary, so there is a >> > proposal to

Re:[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ Schema Registry 0.1.0

+1, I Checked[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2022-10-18 11:41:32, "nize" wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > >This is the vote for 0.1.0 of Apache RocketMQ Schema Registry. >

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-50]RocketMQ Transaction Message Improvement

+1 在 2022-10-18 10:09:20，"heng du" 写道： >+1 > >Xinyu Zhou 于2022年10月18日周二 10:05写道： > >> +1 >> >> Thanks for this RIP! >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 6:51 PM tihong ruan wrote: >> >> > As discussed in the previous email, we discussed RocketMQ Transaction >> > Message Improvement, and it's time to

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-46] Observability improvement for RocketMQ

+1 在 2022-09-28 16:16:10，"Zhouxiang Zhan" 写道： >+1 > >On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 5:22 PM lollipop wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:43 PM Xinyu Zhou wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:36 PM aaron ai wrote: >> > >> > > +1, Looking forward to the follow-up pull

Re:Re: Re: Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ C# SDK 5.0.0 RC1

t;from NuGet. Does that make sense to you? > >Regards, >Xinyu Zhou > >On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 3:17 PM jinrongtong wrote: > >> -1, IMO, it is inappropriate to include the implementation of other >> languages in the source code package when releasing C# SDK, which will &g

Re:Re: Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ C# SDK 5.0.0 RC1

-1, IMO, it is inappropriate to include the implementation of other languages in the source code package when releasing C# SDK, which will mislead users. It would be better to repackage. 在 2022-09-19 16:31:02，"aaron ai" 写道： >+1 > >hill 于2022年9月19日周一 16:30写道： > >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> 在

Re:Re:[RESTART][VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC2

+1, I checked[OK] extract the zip and check if the source version is correct[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512[OK] maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2022-09-19 19:39:25, "hill" wrote: >Git tag for the release should be updated to > > > >f3e113cb1f98ced8327e7c97bfb5a623950339ef > > > >

Re:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0

+1， I checkd [OK] verify the hash for release tag [OK] the release note is clear At 2022-09-14 09:20:09, "heng du" wrote: +1 I checked: ok check LICENSE, should be Apache V2 ok check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if necessary ok deploy Apache RocketMQ by Operator

Re:Re:Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1 RC1

+1, I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right[OK] The release note is clear[OK] verify the asc(PGP sign) At 2022-08-31 14:52:22, "hill" wrote: >+1 > >At 2022-08-31 13:32:54, "Xiaorui Wang" wrote: >>+1 >> >>yukon 于2022年8月31日

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ-MQTT 1.0.0

+1, I checked [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts [OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right [OK] Verify the asc(PGP sign),SHA512 At 2022-08-29 10:07:06, "Ping Wang" wrote: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ-MQTT 1.0.0 Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for

Re:Re: [ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Sun Xiaojian(apache id: sunxiaojian)

Congrats, Xiaojian 在 2022-08-11 10:24:37，"yukon" 写道： >Congrats, Xiaojian > >Regards, >yukon > >On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:16 AM Hu Zongtang wrote: > >> Congrats, guys :-) >> >> 发件人: heng du >> 发送时间: 2022年8月2日 17:44 >> 收件人: dev >> 主题: Re: [ANNOUNCE]New

[ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Zhangheng Huang(hzh0425)

Hi Apache RocketMQ Community, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache RocketMQ has invited Zhangheng Huang (apache id: hzh0425, github id:hzh0425) to become committers, and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Congrats, guys :-) Best Wishes, RongtongJin

Re:Re: ​[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Client Go Native 2.1.1.

+1 I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.[OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.[OK] Maven jar in nexus repo is right At 2022-07-27 09:47:28, "heng du" wrote: >+1 >I checked： > >Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current

[RESULT][VOTE]The code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch

Hi RocketMQ Community, This is the result of the vote on the proposal that the code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch, and it has been passed with [5] binding +1s, [3] non-binding: *Binding votes +1s:* dongeforever(dongefore...@apache.org) Du Heng(duhengfore...@apache.org)

Re:Re: [VOTE] The code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch

+1 At 2022-07-13 03:50:35, "yukon" wrote: >+1 > >On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:46 PM cserwen wrote: > >> +1 >> >> > 在 2022年7月12日，10:19，jinrongtong 写道： >> > >> > Hi, RocketMQ Community, >> > >> > As discussed in the p

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-45]RocketMQ Replicator 2.0

+1 在 2022-07-12 15:19:14，"heng du" 写道： >+1 > >dongeforever 于2022年7月12日周二 14:44写道： > >> +1. >> >> BTW, currently, it does not have an offset replicator for Group Offsets. >> >> zhibo li 于2022年7月12日周二 14:32写道： >> >> > Hi, RocketMQ Community, >> > >> > >> > As discussed in the previous email, we

[VOTE] The code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch

Hi, RocketMQ Community, As discussed in the previous email, we want to merge the code of the 5.0-beta into develop branch. We also create a new branch 4.9.x to fix bugs in the 4.9.4 LTS version. So I start this email thread to enter the voting process for the previous discussion. Note:

[DISCUSS] The code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch

Hi, everyone I hope you’ve all been doing well. Recently we released the 4.9.4 LTS version. The LTS version is the long-term support version. Subsequent bug fixes will be backported to this version from the trunk in a timely manner. It is expected that the LTS version will support an 18-month

[RESULT][VOTE][RIP-44] Support DLedger Controller

Hello RocketMQ Community, This is the vote result for RIP-44 Support DLedger Controller, and it has been passed with [4] binding +1s, [1] non-binding: *Binding votes +1s:* dongeforever(dongefore...@apache.org) Du Heng(duhengfore...@apache.org) yukon(yu...@apache.org)

[VOTE][RIP-44]Support DLedger Controller

Hi, RocketMQ Community, As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP 44 to support dledger controller. Now the shepherds @duhenglucky and @dongeforever are willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread to enter the voting process. The vote will be

Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-43] Support Timing Messages with Arbitrary Time Delay

+1 在 2022-06-23 22:37:53，"fuyou" 写道： >+1,Improve delay message feature. > >季俊涛 <3160102...@zju.edu.cn>于2022年6月23日 周四21:09写道： > >> Hi, RocketMQ Community, >> >> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to support >> Timing Messages with Arbitrary Time Delay. Now the shepherd

  1   2   >