Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ EventBridge 1.1.0

+1 On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 2:22 PM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 1.1.0 release of Apache RocketMQ EventBridge. In this > version, We will be releasing some functionality of EventBridge. Including: > [+] The runtime of eventbridge. > [+]

Re: [VOTE][RIP-68] RocketMQ ACL 2.0

+1 Glad to see the proposal for Apache RocketMQ ACL 2.0. I believe this new version will significantly enhance the security features of RocketMQ and provide users with more granular and flexible access control. On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:50 PM zhimin li wrote: > +1, The design document is very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.4 RC1

+1 I have checked: [OK ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package. [OK ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK ] License and Notice are correct in the source package. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 PM qiaoao wrote: > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.3 RC1

+1 On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:30 PM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 2.0.3 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs. > > RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface > Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of >

Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.5 RC1

+1 I have checked all of the four items. On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00 AM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 5.0.5 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for Java. > > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis >

Re: Re:[VOTE] Release gRPC .NET Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.1.0 RC1

+1 On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:01 AM Qingshan Lin wrote: > +1 > > On 2023/03/18 14:12:18 jinrongtong wrote: > > +1, I checked that Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current > artifacts > > > > > > > > At 2023-03-17 14:59:39, "aaron ai" wrote: > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > >

Re: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Prepare to release Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1

+1 On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:47 AM Xin Wang wrote: > Great. Thanks, Zhouxiang for managing the release. > > Xinyu Zhou 于2023年2月10日周五 10:32写道： > > > +1 > > > > Thanks for volunteering for this release. > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:16 PM 643422162 <643422...@qq.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > >

Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-61] RocketMQ EventBridge Runtime

+1 to start the RIP On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:35 AM Qingshan Lin wrote: > nice work，this will make a better EventBridge。 > > On 2023/01/30 12:57:47 Zhanhui Li wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 7:53 PM Xin Wang wrote: > > > > > +1 Nick work. Thanks shenlin. > > > > > > Xinyu Zhou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.2 RC1

+1 On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 11:12 AM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 2.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs. > > RocketMQ APIs use Protocol Buffers version 3 (proto3) as their Interface > Definition Language (IDL) to define the API interface and the structure of >

Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.4 RC1

+1 On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:36 AM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > This is the vote for 5.0.4 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java. > > > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis > , and are built on top

Re: [VOTE] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.3 RC1

+1 I have checked all of the four items. On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:52 AM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > This is the vote for 5.0.3 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java. > > > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis >

Re: [VOTE][RIP-54] Backporting of Remoting-based Client

+1 On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 1:52 PM Zhanhui Li wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:07 AM Xinyu Zhou wrote: > > > +1, make the remoting client more stable. > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:52 PM aaron ai wrote: > > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > As discussed in the previous

Re: [VOTE][RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback

+1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:53 PM aaron ai wrote: > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > As discussed in the previous email, this is the vote for *RIP-56 Replace > Logging Module with Shaded Logback*. > > links: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ EventBridge 1.0.0

+1 I checked: [OK ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the source package. [OK ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK ] License and Notice are correct in the source package. On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:02 PM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] RIP-55 Support remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module

+1 for supporting remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module. On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 2:40 PM Zhouxiang Zhan wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > There's an issue with remoting protocol in rocketmq proxy module. > > Links: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback

+1 On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:33 PM zhilia...@163.com wrote: > +1 > Glad to see this improvment > > > > zhilia...@163.com > > From: aaron ai > Date: 2022-10-21 11:49 > To: dev > Subject: [DISCUSS] [RIP-56] Replace Logging Module with Shaded Logback > Hi, RocketMQ Community： > > We noticed that

Re: [VOTE] [RIP-51] Pop orderly improvement

+1 On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:04 AM Xinyu Zhou wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:41 AM fuyou wrote: > > > +1 > > > > L K 于2022年10月18日周二 10:31写道： > > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > We discussed enhancing server side offset management ability for > > > RocketMQ, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.1 RC1

+1, I checked: [OK] Extract the zip and check if the source version is correct with 2.0.1; [OK] The Apache V2 license file and Notice file is included in the package. On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 7:48 PM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 2.0.1 RC1 of Apache

Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.2 RC1

+1 On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:01 AM aaron ai wrote: > OK > > Xinyu Zhou 于2022年9月29日周四 17:30写道： > > > +1 > > > > All is fine, please don't forget to add the release records here: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-site/blob/new-official-website/src/pages/download.md > > > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE][RIP-46] Observability improvement for RocketMQ

+1 On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:43 PM Xinyu Zhou wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:36 PM aaron ai wrote: > > > +1, Looking forward to the follow-up pull request. > > > > SSpirits 于2022年9月27日周二 14:29写道： > > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we discussed adding native metrics > >

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ Golang SDK 5.0.0 RC1

+1 On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:07 PM heng du wrote: > +1 > I checked： > (1).License and Notice are correct in the source package. > (2).All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > (3)Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > Xinyu Zhou 于2022年9月19日周一

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member for Apache RocketMQ: Qiudi Yang

Hi Apache RocketMQ Community, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache RocketMQ has invited Qiudi Yang[1][2] (Apache ID:@jodie) to become PMC Member and we are pleased to announce that she has accepted. Over the last 10 years, Qiudi Yang has made many noteworthy contributions to the

Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC1

+1 I checked： [OK ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. [OK ] License and Notice are correct in source package. On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 10:32 AM Zhanhui Li wrote: > +1 > > I checked the license, notice and checksum, GPG signature. > > I also validated compilation

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.0 RC1

+1，checked： [OK ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. [OK ] License and Notice are correct in source package. On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:13 PM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 2.0.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ APIs. > > RocketMQ APIs use

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ 4.9.4 RC1

+1, I checked: [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:25 AM hill wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, >

Re: [VOTE][RIP-38] RocketMQ EventBridge

+1 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:28 AM dongeforever wrote: > The RIP is great！ > > But I still have a doubt that what's the relationship between > rocketmq-connect and rocketmq-eventbridge. > > Will the two projects go forward independently or be mixed together? > > The doubt does not prevent the

Re: [DISCUSS] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol

+1 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:57 PM Zhanhui Li wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:45 PM Xiaorui Wang > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Best regards, > > > > Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair > > [1] https://github.com/vintagewang > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM 陈仲良 wrote:

Re: [VOTE][RIP-37] New and unified APIs

+1 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:55 PM Rongtong Jin wrote: > +1 > > aaron ai yangkun@gmail.com写道： > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to establish > new > > and unified APIs and it's time to start an email thread to enter the > voting >

Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ spring 2.0.3 release.

+ 1 On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:18 PM ShannonDing wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > > This is the vote for the 2.0.3 release of Apache rocketmq-spring > > > > > Github repo: > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring > > > > > The staging repo: > >

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.5.1 RC2.

+1 On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:28 PM heng du wrote: > +1 > > dongeforever 于2019年5月22日周三 下午12:07写道： > > > +1 Nice > > > > huzongt...@cmss.chinamobile.com > > 于2019年5月22日周三 上午10:23写道： > > > >> +1, we have already verified in our enviroment include master/slave and > >> dledger pattern when acl

Re: [VOTE]RocketMQ-spring 2.0.0 Release and Graduation

+1 On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:34 PM heng du wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for the 2.0.0 release and the graduation of Apache > RocketMQ-spring. > > Github repo: *https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring > * > This is the first

Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ-client-cpp 1.2.0 Release And Graduation

+ 1 On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:21 AM heng du wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release and the graduation of Apache > RocketMQ-client-cpp. > > Github repo: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp < > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp> > This

Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ-client-python 1.2.0 Release And Graduation

+1 I've checked the LICENSE, NOTICE and Copyright, LGTM. Thanks On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM heng du wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release and the graduation of Apache > RocketMQ-client-python. > > Github repo:

Re: [STARTUP] Apache RocketMQ Meetup - Hangzhou

Hi all: I would like to join the meetup to share a topic named 《Alibaba Cloud Message Queue based on RocketMQ》, aimed to introduce some best practices for adapting RocketMQ to serve as a cloud product. Best Regards On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:35 AM Gosling Von wrote: > Dear Apache RocketMQ