+1 (Non-binding)
I've checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[OK] No
+1，I checked
[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK] The code can be built success in the source package.
[OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[OK] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
At 2024-02-13 18:17:38,
+1
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:29 AM ShannonDing wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2024-02-13 18:17:38, "jinrongtong" wrote:
> >Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >This is the vote for 4.9.8 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> >The artifacts:
>
+1
At 2024-02-13 18:17:38, "jinrongtong" wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>This is the vote for 4.9.8 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
>This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc1/
>
>The staging repo:
