Request the Permission of ASF logos in Apache RocketMQ Meetup

2017-11-28 Thread yukon
etc. Requests the permission of these two logos. Regards, yukon Apache_PoweredBy.ai Description: application/illustrator

Re: Request the Permission of ASF logos in Apache RocketMQ Meetup

2017-11-29 Thread yukon
- - > Vice President Marketing & Publicity > The Apache Software Foundation > > Tel +1 617 921 8656 <+1%20617-921-8656> > Skype sallykhudairi > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, at 22:54, yukon wrote: > > Hi Sally, > > ``` > as that has a few more restrict

[RESULT][VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0 RC1

2017-12-17 Thread yukon
Hello RocketMQ Community, The Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0 vote is now closed and has passed with 3 binding +1s, 2 non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1: Binding votes +1s: dongeforever Von Gosling yukon Non-binding votes +1s: Rovshen Nazarov liuxue The release will be published soon. Thanks, The Apache

Re: What's DLQ?

2017-12-17 Thread yukon
, yukon On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Frank Bian <frankb...@126.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > What is DLQ or DLQ topic ? > > I found that the msg will be queued by DLQ topic when the reconsumeTimes > of it is bigger than maxReconsumeTimes , so the DLQ is special topic for &

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0

2017-12-18 Thread yukon
Hi all, Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability. The Apache RocketMQ community would like to announce the release of Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0. This release supports some

Re: About version 4.2.0

2017-12-18 Thread yukon
Hi Martin, The download link for 4.2.0 has been added to rocketmq website, please check it. Regards, yukon On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:35 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > 4.2.0 has been released just now, the download link will be updated soon~ > > Regard

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0 RC1

2017-12-13 Thread yukon
HI Von, Thanks for your careful check. We will fix it int the next release and submit a hotfix soon~ Also, here is my +1 (binding). Sincerely request everybody review and vote on the RC1. Regards yukon On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote: > +1

[VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0 RC1

2017-12-13 Thread yukon
Hello Apache RocketMQ Community, This is the vote for 4.2.0 of Apache RocketMQ. We now kindly request the RocketMQ community review and vote on this release artifact. Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache RocketMQ 4.2.0

2017-12-20 Thread yukon
Hi sebb and justin, thanks to your suggestion. I have polished our quick start doc and provided simple steps to build from official Apache release. Also, we will use the mirror site link in our next release announcement. Regards, yukon On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Von Gosling <vong

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Congrats, CSoC Start !

2018-04-26 Thread yukon
Hi Guys, Congratulations on getting these GSoC projects, though that it's too late. Looking forward to working with you guys this summer. ``` I would like to ask why Yukon isn't listed in the mentors list assigned to my project? ``` I am, but the listed name is `Xinyu Zhou` which is my full

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate JIRA to Github Issue

2018-01-05 Thread yukon
Hi all, Please note that we cannot migrate any existing Jira tickets to Github Issues. We need to start fresh and migrate the incomplete tickets to Github manually. I will open a migrate ticket to INFRA next week if there is no opposite voice. Regards, yukon On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Xin

IP clearance progress of RocketMQ CPP SDK donation

2018-01-10 Thread yukon
a vote in Apache RocketMQ community. [1]. https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf Regards, yukon

Re: The State of RocketMQ Streaming Integration

2018-01-19 Thread yukon
Cool, thanks for your outstanding contribution, to help RocketMQ community integrate with other streaming platforms. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Xin Wang wrote: > Hi devs, > > I have finished the improvements for integrating RocketMQ with Apache > Storm. > Main

Re: IP clearance progress of RocketMQ CPP SDK donation

2018-01-18 Thread yukon
Hi all, We should speed up the IP clearance process. We will call the vote in dev soon if our PMC have no other opinion. Regards, yukon On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi qiwei, > > > > Also I don’t think there is any r

Re: IP clearance progress of RocketMQ CPP SDK donation

2018-01-11 Thread yukon
n, thereby violating the first criterion for license approval. ``` Please qiwei help us resolve this issue. 3. big_endian.cpp is derived from the Google Chrome, which is under BSD license and compatible with ASF: https://www.chromium.org/ Regards, yukon On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:07 PM,

Re: IP clearance progress of RocketMQ CPP SDK donation

2018-01-11 Thread yukon
And kindly please contributors, committers, and PMC members help us check this code base, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-352 On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:02 PM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, all > > The donated software has three source dependencies: &

Re: IP clearance progress of RocketMQ CPP SDK donation

2018-01-12 Thread yukon
se, I update > the source code zip(shasum:c3553dbe3c1524fe4afb3a619e2c7acfdf9eefed) in > attachment, please review it, thanks. > > -- > 发件人:王启伟(孝孺) <qiwei@alibaba-inc.com> > 发送时间:2018年1月12日(星期五) 15

Re: [CLOSE][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ CPP SDK Code Donation

2018-02-05 Thread yukon
I am sorry to close the vote, because of the error text. I will open a new vote soon~ On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Von Gosling <vongosl...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Looking forward to our continuous endeavour for cpp client :-) > > Best Regards, > Von Gosling >

[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ CPP SDK Code Donation

2018-02-05 Thread yukon
the contribution because... Regards, yukon

[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ CPP SDK Code Donation

2018-02-05 Thread yukon
because... Regards, yukon

Re: The source code on master branch can't pass unit test

2018-02-12 Thread yukon
I have updated the test certs please try again KaiYuan Yang 于2018年2月12日 周一下午5:24写道: > How to reproduce the error:just run "mvn clean install -DskipITs" on > the latest code > Error > message:org.apache.rocketmq.remoting.exception.RemotingSendRequestException: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate JIRA to Github Issue

2018-01-02 Thread yukon
Hi Justin, That makes sense, +dev list. Please let us know if anyone is in trouble when submitting a report to JIRA system. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > IMO it would be better to discuss this on dev list as I think as it > impacts

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate JIRA to Github Issue

2018-01-02 Thread yukon
Hi Justin, RocketMQ is hosted on Gitbox now, and every software engineer has a proper way to reach GitHub, no need to worry about it :) Regards, yukon On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Consider that most of user

Re: [DISCUSS] How to handle Ip-clearance for apache rocketmq community projects

2018-01-04 Thread yukon
@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E [2]. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ Regards, yukon On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:23 PM, vongosling <fengji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to miss the context. Repost again :-) > > Hi, > > As the topic said, I would like to put forward this issue de

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.1 RC1

2018-08-29 Thread yukon
+1 On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:40 PM Shannon wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > At 2018-08-29 20:36:19, "heng du" wrote: > >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > >This is the vote for 4.3.1 of Apache RocketMQ. We now kindly request the > >RocketMQ community review and vote on this release artifact. > > >

Re: GSOC - ROCKETMQ-380

2018-03-13 Thread yukon
rk.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation. > proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:179) > at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy. > invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:213) > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy71.fetchAllTopicList(Unknown Source) > at org.a

Re: GSOC - ROCKETMQ-380

2018-03-12 Thread yukon
Hi, could you please provide any log and the docker network model? On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:30 AM, p...@husky.neu.edu <p...@husky.neu.edu> wrote: > Hi Yukon, > > This is Kailun. > > I met a problem as I go through the console. > > In quick start, the console run in do

Re: [GSOC][ROCKETMQ-380] Provide a modern and friendly console for RocketMQ

2018-03-15 Thread yukon
Hi, This is a commercial version[1] of apache rocketmq and could be your reference. After trying this console, hope you could draft the design ASAP and then we can discuss based on i. Regards, yukon [1]. https://www.alibabacloud.com/product/mq On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Ahmed Ifhaam

Re: 答复: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-124] Support non-redundant message delivery mechanism

2018-03-08 Thread yukon
m. > > 1. The idea with incremental Ids is actually quite good. But @Yukon > mentioned that duplication can also be controlled by an application > (special KV Property) in which case different producers may produce the > same message that needs to deduplicated on the broker. > SessionId+Incre

Re: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-122] Support Global Ordered Messaging

2018-03-15 Thread yukon
Hi, Of course, we can work together to finetune your design draft. Regards, yukon On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:33 AM, sowmya s <sowmya9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, yukon and Von, > > I've shared my GSOC - 18 draft of the project. I'm looking forward to > working with all

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-377] Implement a openwhisk-package-rocketmq to support serverless function

2018-03-26 Thread yukon
Hi, I looked through your proposal, that's exactly what the issue needed, let's move forward it. Regards, yukon On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM, mayar.abdelaziz1...@gmail.com < mayar.abdelaziz1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yukon and Von, > > I have investigated the issue we

Re: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-122] Support Global Ordered Messaging

2018-03-27 Thread yukon
Cool, thanks for your efforts. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:02 AM, sowmya s <sowmya9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Yukon, > I've submitted my final proposal addressing your comments as well. Hoping > to work on this project for the summer. In the meantime i'm working on > prot

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-386] Provide an integration plugin with apache hbase

2018-03-27 Thread yukon
Hi, You can pick up an issue from our JIRA system, the JIRA system is disabled now but there are many existing issues need to be resolved. Regards, yukon On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Madhushika Jayasinghe < madhushikajayasinghe91...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yukon, > > I wo

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-386] Provide an integration plugin with apache hbase

2018-03-28 Thread yukon
Also, you can use SonarQube or findbugs to scan the code base of RocketMQ, I am sure you will find some major issues which can be addressed easily. Regards, yukon On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:54 AM, yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > You can pick up an issue from our JIRA s

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-377] Implement a openwhisk-package-rocketmq to support serverless function

2018-03-24 Thread yukon
Hi, ``` Do you want to replace the message passing system Kafka with RocketMQ in the OpenWhisk implementation? ``` No, we want to provide a third-party package for OpenWhisk platform, like https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-kafka On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:02 AM,

Re: The State of RocketMQ Streaming Integration

2018-04-03 Thread yukon
Thanks, Xin! These plugins have greatly enriched the RocketMQ community, hope we could get more feedback from the community about these plugins. Regards, yukon On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Xin Wang <data.xinw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm glad to say that the

Re: [GSOC2018][ROCKETMQ-379] Support AMQP protocol for RocketMQ-Proposal

2018-03-25 Thread yukon
Looks great, let's upload it. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Ratnasingam Kasthuriraajan < kasthuriraaja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yukon, Von > > I have updated my draft proposal in a new link with the appropriate could > you please check it. > > https://do

Re: [GSOC][ROCKETMQ-127]Providing a rocketmq-proxy to support MQTT protocol

2018-03-16 Thread yukon
As we are implementing a proxy server, so may Linkerd[1] could give us some hints. [1]. https://linkerd.io/ Regards, yukon On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Sudaraka Yasindu <sudarakayasi...@gmail.com > wrote: > Thank you for the clarification Yukon. I am looking into it. &g

Re: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-122] Support Global Ordered Messaging

2018-03-16 Thread yukon
Cool, let's focus on it and see whether is there anything can be polished. Regards On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:54 PM, sowmya s <sowmya9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey yukon, > I submitted my draft on the summer of code homepage a couple of days ago, > also attaching the link her

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-386] Provide an integration plugin with apache hbase

2018-03-20 Thread yukon
Hi, Sorry to have misled you, I mean the plugin could bring the ability of off-line storage to RocketMQ. As for the plugin, should contain sink and source connectors to send and pull data from HBase. Regards, yukon On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Madhushika Jayasinghe < madhushikajayasingh

[ANNOUNCE] JIRA system has been disabled for RocketMQ

2018-03-21 Thread yukon
Hi all, We have disabled JIRA system and enabled GitHub issue, please use Github Issue for the new bug report and feature request. And there are some ongoing GSoC projects in JIRA system, please open a thread on dev list to discuss and track them. Regards, yukon

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-386] Provide an integration plugin with apache hbase

2018-03-21 Thread yukon
adhushika > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 8:10 AM yukon <yu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Sorry to have misled you, I mean the plugin could bring the ability of > > off-line storage to RocketMQ. > > > > As for the plugin, should contain s

Re: [GSOC][ROCKETMQ-127]Providing a rocketmq-proxy to support MQTT protocol

2018-03-23 Thread yukon
Looks great, I added some comments~ On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Sudaraka Yasindu <sudarakayasi...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Yukon and Von, > I started drafting my proposal. Can you please take a look and let me know > whether I should change the content or add something more. I

Re: [GSOC][ROCKETMQ-127]Providing a rocketmq-proxy to support MQTT protocol

2018-03-19 Thread yukon
Great, you should ensure that the vert.x mqtt server has enough secondary development capabilities if you want to reuse it. After all, we need the server react with RocketMQ cluster. Regards On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Sudaraka Yasindu <sudarakayasi...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Yuko

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-372] Providing a REST Proxy to Support HTTP/2 Protocol

2018-03-19 Thread yukon
info. Are we going to use Linkerd [1] directly in > implementing the proxy server, or is it only to be used as a reference? > > [1] https://linkerd.io/ > <https://mltrk.io/link/https%3A%2F%2Flinkerd.io%2F/QE9YmLinIw2A3pLINZj4> > > Best Regards, > Menuka > > On 19

Re: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-122] Support Global Ordered Messaging

2018-03-19 Thread yukon
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. As for: ``` I'm looking at the BrokerController and MessageStore implementation and hooks to understand where the merge logic will best fit. ``` how is it going? Regards On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 11:30 AM, sowmya s <sowmya9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank

Re: [GSoC][ROCKETMQ-372] Providing a REST Proxy to Support HTTP/2 Protocol

2018-03-18 Thread yukon
Hi, the current protocol is customized, please see: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/master/remoting/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/remoting/protocol On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:06 AM, Menuka Warushavithana < menuka...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > Hi Yukon, > It is mentioned in th

Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [GSOC|ROCKETMQ-123]Support Distributed Transactional Messaging

2018-03-19 Thread yukon
+ riven Hi Dexin, Riven is a very senior engineer in RocketMQ community, especially in distributed transaction area. He is enthusiastic and will help you finished the design. Regards, yukon On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:13 PM, 李 德鑫 <dexi...@outlook.com> wrote: > Sorry, I forgot to add

Re: [GSOC][ROCKETMQ-380] Provide a modern and friendly console for RocketMQ

2018-03-19 Thread yukon
Yeah, it's important to include these feature in our console. BTW, what's your idea about how to handle user features and operations features? Integrate these features in one console with two kinds of role(user and admin), or provide two independent consoles? Regards, yukon On Mon, Mar 19

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.2 RC1

2018-11-07 Thread yukon
+1 binding On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM 魏欢 wrote: > +1 > glad to hear the new release! > > > -- Original -- > From: "dongeforever"; > Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2018 01:26 PM > To: "dev"; > > Subject: Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.3.2 RC1 > > > +1 binding >

Re: [VOTE] RocketMQ-client-go 1.2.0 Release And Graduation

2019-01-03 Thread yukon
+1 On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 2:15 PM Kevin Wang wrote: > +1 Go! > > > > 在 2019年1月4日,下午1:15,Shannon 写道: > > > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release and the graduation of Apache > RocketMQ-client-go. > > > > Github repo:

Re: RIP23: Support gRPC protocol

2021-06-09 Thread yukon
+1 for this proposal. Obviously, supporting gRPC could make it easier for RocketMQ contributors to write multi-Language SDKs. Looking forward to more details of this proposal. Regards, yukon On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:10 AM Zhanhui Li wrote: > Hi, > This proposal, in general, is in the

Re: RIP 24: Introduce multi-protocol support

2021-09-30 Thread yukon
Hello, community, Any further opinions about this RIP? If not, we would like to propose a draft of the new protocol spec. Regards, yukon On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:14 AM vongosling wrote: > Subscribe to the dev mailing list before sending emails. Otherwise, emails > cannot b

Re: [DISCUSS] RIP-25 Ease of Use Improvements on RocketMQ Client API

2021-09-30 Thread yukon
Great catch, we will draft a new version of client APIs in few days~ On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:19 PM dongeforever wrote: > The idea is OK. > And the same time, it is better to show more details. Maybe drafting the > new API interface is a good way to dive deep. > > caigy 于2021年9月28日周二

Re: RIP 24: Introduce multi-protocol support

2021-10-01 Thread yukon
We have drafted the new rocketmq protocol and APIs, any feedback is welcome. Please refer https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-apis/pull/1/files for more details. Regards On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:40 AM yukon wrote: > Hello, community, > > Any further opinions about this RIP? If not,

Re: [DISCUSS] Support KV semantic storage

2021-09-26 Thread yukon
kv can be an effective complement to the message model, the rocketmq with kv support will provide more lightweight features for our users. As for the implementation, we actually need more discussion and research to help us reach a consensus. It would be nice if any community contributor wants to

Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-37] New and unified APIs

2022-03-13 Thread yukon
h the reason > > > Best Regards! > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:32 PM yuzhou wrote: > > > Thanks, glad to see that weakly typed topic will keep exist. > > > > On 2022/03/10 08:01:46 yukon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > A weakly typed t

Re: [VOTE][RIP-38] RocketMQ EventBridge

2022-03-13 Thread yukon
+1 for moving forward. On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:26 AM 沈林 <2011shen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for RocketMQ EventBridge, and you can read the proposal by > the link below: > >

Re: [VOTE] [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol

2022-03-13 Thread yukon
+1 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:02 AM Zhouxiang Zhan wrote: > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for [RIP-39] Support gRPC protocol. > > Detailed proposal . > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > of votes

Re: [DISCUSS] RIP-35 queue service framework(QSF)

2022-03-16 Thread yukon
.com/document/d/10wSe24TAls7J9y0Ql4MYo73FX8g1aX9guoxBxzQhJgg > > > > > > > RIP 35 queue service framework(QSF) > > Status > > ● Current State: Proposed > > ● Authors: booom( booom (jason) · GitHub) > > ● Shepherds: yukon( zhouxinyu (yukon) · GitHub) &g

Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-37] New and unified APIs

2022-03-10 Thread yukon
. And, we won't disable the weakly typed topic, from an implementation perspective, we just add an attribute for the topic to indicate whether it's a strongly typed topic, and a strongly typed topic can be converted to a weakly typed topic easily. Regards, yukon On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:04 PM aaron

Re: [DISCUSS] RIP-36 Optimize topic routing mechanism

2022-02-24 Thread yukon
Great, this is an important improvement, could reduce failover time significantly. I would like to be another shepherd if needed. Regards, yukon On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:14 PM Rongtong Jin < jinrongton...@mails.ucas.ac.cn> wrote: > This is a nice RIP, which can solve the issue

Re: [rocketmq-client-csharp] branch develop created (now 9c5b36e)

2022-02-16 Thread yukon
Hi Von, This new client is based on the new gRPC APIs. And, we will start a discussion in the community soon. Regards, yukon On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 8:46 AM vongosling wrote: > Hi, > > I couldn't find any discussion about csharp client. Do we need to add back > a discussion to t

Re: [VOTE] [RIP-35]Use rocketmq instead of mysql as state store

2022-02-17 Thread yukon
+1 to minimize the dependencies. On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:07 AM Amber Liu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > nize 于2022年2月18日周五 10:06写道: > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to replace > mysql > > with RocketMQ as a state store in

Re: [VOTE][RIP-36] Optimize topic routing mechanism

2022-03-02 Thread yukon
+1 for moving forward. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:42 PM xijiu <422766...@qq.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to optimize > topic routing mechanism. Now the shepherds @dongeforever and @yukon are > willi

Re: [DISCUSS] RIP-35 queue service framework(QSF)

2022-03-28 Thread yukon
Is anyone interested in this RIP? Please feel free to express your opinions. About this RIP, my concern is that QSF encapsulates the details of the producer/consumer may lead to troubleshooting complicated, although QSF is simple. Regards, yukon On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 1:43 AM Jason.Chen wrote

Re: [VOTE][RIP-33] RocketMQ MQTT

2022-02-09 Thread yukon
+1 On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:39 PM heng du wrote: > +1 > > Rongtong Jin 于2022年2月9日周三 19:34写道: > > > +1, really looking forward to > > > > Ping Wang pingw...@gmail.com写道: > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to support > MQTT > > >

Re: Re: [VOTE][RIP-29] Optimize RocketMQ NameServer

2022-01-17 Thread yukon
+1 On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:45 AM Ze Ni wrote: > +1 > > ShannonDing 于2022年1月18日周二 11:40写道: > > > +1 > > > > 在 2022-01-18 11:13:33,"vongosling" 写道: > > >+1 > > > > > >周波 于2022年1月18日周二 10:54写道: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> jinrongtong 于2022年1月18日周二 10:28写道: > > >> > > >> > Hi, RocketMQ

Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-33] RocketMQ MQTT

2022-01-25 Thread yukon
Great!!! A big step of the RocketMQ community toward the IoT ecosystem. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:22 PM heng du wrote: > long-awaited feature > > Ping Jack 于2022年1月26日周三 14:15写道: > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community: > > > > I want to start a RIP to support MQTT protocol architecture model so that >

Re: [DISSCUSS][RIP-32] Slave Acting Master Mode

2022-01-26 Thread yukon
+1 Enhance the ability of RocketMQ native HA service. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 4:20 PM dongeforever wrote: > +1. > The second-level message, such as scheduled/transactional message, should > not be bound to the master. > > heng du 于2022年1月26日周三 12:54写道: > > > Great improvement, whether in terms

Re: [VOTE][RIP-43] Support Timing Messages with Arbitrary Time Delay

2022-06-30 Thread yukon
+1 On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 3:24 PM heng du wrote: > +1 > > dongeforever 于2022年6月30日周四 15:13写道: > > > +1 > > > > 643422162 <643422...@qq.com.invalid> 于2022年6月24日周五 22:13写道: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > -- 原始邮件 -- > > > 发件人: "季俊涛"<3160102...@zju.edu.cn; > > >

Re: [VOTE][RIP-44]Support DLedger Controller

2022-06-30 Thread yukon
+1 On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 3:25 PM heng du wrote: > +1 > This RIP not only provides a more flexible HA model, but also unifies > RocketMQ's storage and replication capabilities > > dongeforever 于2022年6月30日周四 15:16写道: > > > +1 > > Great Job. > > This RIP will make a big difference to the HA

[ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Lin Shen(shenlin) and Yangkun Ai(aaronai)

2022-06-14 Thread yukon
. Congrats, guys :-) Best regards, Yukon

Re: [DISCUSS][RIP-42]Support Timing Messages with Arbitrary Time Delay

2022-06-20 Thread yukon
The long-awaited feature for our community, this RIP will make our timer message more competitive, and make the new SimpleConsumer API `changeInvisibleDuration` more flexible. On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 11:42 AM dongeforever wrote: > Good Job. > > It will be nice if there are some performance test

Re: [VOTE] The code of 5.0.0-beta merge into develop branch

2022-07-12 Thread yukon
+1 On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 2:46 PM cserwen wrote: > +1 > > > 在 2022年7月12日,10:19,jinrongtong 写道: > > > > Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > As discussed in the previous email, we want to merge the code of the > 5.0-beta into develop branch. We also create a new branch 4.9.x to fix bugs > in the

Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ APIs 2.0.0 RC1

2022-07-17 Thread yukon
+1 binding I checked: 1. The signed key can be found in the KEYs file 2. LICENSE is Apache V2, the notice of Protocol Buffers has been added to the notice of this release. 3. gpg verify ok for both source and binary releases. 4. sha512sum ok for both source and binary releases. Regards, yukon

Re: ​[VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Client Go Native 2.1.1.

2022-07-28 Thread yukon
+1, thanks. On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:48 PM ShannonDing wrote: > +1, as RM of this 2.1.1 version, I has checked all issues in list. > > At 2022-07-25 21:15:21, "ShannonDing" wrote: > >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > > >This is the vote for version 2.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ Client Go

Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-17 Thread yukon
Hi, There are some playbooks to deploy rocketmq that could be your reference: https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-rocketmq On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM ShannonDing wrote: > +1, > > At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生" wrote: > >Hi, RocketMQ Community, > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Discuss] RocketMQ-MQTT 1.0.0 LTS release

2022-08-26 Thread yukon
/license_checker.yaml And, please note the license compatibility of binary dependencies, For more details please refer to: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Regards, yukon On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ping Wang wrote: > Hello, RocketMQ Community, > > > This is th

Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Java Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.1 RC1

2022-08-31 Thread yukon
+1 On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:55 AM aaron ai wrote: > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the vote for 5.0.1 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ client for java. > > Apache RocketMQ clients 5.x series follow the specs of rocketmq-apis > , and are built on top of >

Re: [ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Zhangheng Huang(hzh0425)

2022-08-10 Thread yukon
Congrats, Zhangheng Regards, yukon On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:17 AM Hu Zongtang wrote: > Congrats, guys :-) > > 发件人: Xiaorui Wang > 发送时间: 2022年8月8日 11:36 > 收件人: dev@rocketmq.apache.org > 抄送: us...@rocketmq.apache.org > 主题: Re: [AN

Re: [ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Sun Xiaojian(apache id: sunxiaojian)

2022-08-10 Thread yukon
Congrats, Xiaojian Regards, yukon On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:16 AM Hu Zongtang wrote: > Congrats, guys :-) > > 发件人: heng du > 发送时间: 2022年8月2日 17:44 > 收件人: dev > 主题: Re: [ANNOUNCE]New Committers of Apache RocketMQ: Sun Xiaojian(apache

Re: [Vote] Release gRPC Client for Apache RocketMQ 5.0.0 RC1

2022-08-02 Thread yukon
+1 On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:50 PM aaron ai wrote: > The artifacts have been migrated to the path below: > > Java: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-clients/rocketmq-client-java/5.0.0-rc1/ > CPP: > >