Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/98
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11225316/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11225316)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 37.893% when pulling
Github user hustfxj commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/4#discussion_r113107521
--- Diff:
rocketmq-spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/rocketmq/spark/streaming/MQPullInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
+/*
GitHub user Jaskey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/98
[ROCKETMQ-188]RemotingExecption is not consistent between invoke async and
invoke oneway
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-188
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user vsair commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/97
Hi, Thanks for your contribution! But, could you please rename the title,
like, [ROCKETMQ-XXX]?
Also, you should create an issue at
Hi,
We have finished the second round wiki polish. Thanks bruce advice :-). We
added more articles about the following topics:
1. More examples(Simple Message Example,Order Message Example,Broadcast
Example, Schedule Message Example, Batch Message Example)
2. Architecture
3.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/10
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user lindzh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/10
add batch broadcast arc and schedule example document
Add batch message,broadcast receving,simple message and ordered message
example.
and add deploy and architecture document.
Github user wenfengwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/13
@zhouxinyu The PR can be merged, please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
@zhouxinyu @lizhanhui
please review the updated pr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/97
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211354/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211354)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 30.835% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/97
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211354/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211354)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 30.835% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211182/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211182)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 37.894% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211057/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211057)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 37.891% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211057/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11211057)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 37.891% when pulling
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
@lizhanhui yes it seems reasonable to send heartbeat for all broker as one
time.
Please review the updated pr which only
1. check if the beartbeat table is empty, only log and
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617)
Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 37.761% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617)
Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 37.761% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210617)
Coverage decreased (-0.09%) to 37.761% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210574/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210574)
Coverage increased (+0.004%) to 37.858% when pulling
GitHub user lindzh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/97
fix consumeTimestamp and wrong consumeTimestamp exception message
When I want to consume message,I use the following code,
```
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 37.869% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 37.869% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210427)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 37.869% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 37.974% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 37.974% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/95
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11210353)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 37.974% when pulling
Github user vesense commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/4#discussion_r112874940
--- Diff: rocketmq-storm/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# RocketMQ Storm Integration
--- End diff --
No, this is just a
Github user shroman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/4#discussion_r112873634
--- Diff: rocketmq-storm/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# RocketMQ Storm Integration
--- End diff --
Is this pushed by
28 matches
Mail list logo