Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11880510)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 38.566% when pulling
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/16
This pull request has been merged and please close it at your convenient
time. Thanks for your efforts and contribution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
@dongeforever it looks no changes have been made to the modules which
rocketmq-client depends on.
But what I am concerned is that should rocketmq-tools needs to be
compatable
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/16
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/15
This PR contains contents simple enough, IMO, we can merge it directly as
the original content is pretty misleading.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/16
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11866450)
Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 38.44% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11866450)
Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 38.44% when pulling
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/15
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user lindzh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117#discussion_r120603647
--- Diff:
logappender/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/logappender/common/ProducerInstance.java
---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
public
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/15
@dongeforever @zhouxinyu Any idea?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/16
Could you resolve the conflict firstly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/15
LGTM, +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user zhoudiqiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/16
[ROCKETMQ-221] Website beta version finished
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-221
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
the client module and its dependencies should be compatible with 1.6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11864245)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.145% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11864245)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.145% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11864245)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.145% when pulling
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117#discussion_r120577910
--- Diff:
logappender/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/logappender/common/ProducerInstance.java
---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
public
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863968)
Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 38.707% when pulling
GitHub user dzyangxi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/117
remove
JIRA:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-215?jql=project%20%3D%20ROCKETMQ
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user dzyangxi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/116
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/116
Hi , welcome to contribute!
Please relate the jira issue and also please submit the pr to branch
develop.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user dzyangxi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/116
[Rocketmq 215]Use java 7 syntax to refator code base
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dzyangxi/incubator-rocketmq
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863183)
Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 38.61% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863183)
Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 38.61% when pulling
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111#discussion_r120285629
--- Diff:
remoting/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/remoting/netty/SslHelper.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111#discussion_r120276124
--- Diff:
remoting/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/remoting/netty/NettyRemotingServer.java
---
@@ -128,6 +131,19 @@ public Thread
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/111
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863024)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 38.92% when pulling
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
+1, LGTM~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863006)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.208% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863006)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.208% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11863006)
Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 39.208% when pulling
Github user lizhanhui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120558511
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -30,12 +30,11 @@ It offers a variety of features as follows:
## Apache RocketMQ Community
*
Github user zhouxinyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112
+1, LGTM~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user lizhanhui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120557452
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862791)
Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 38.412% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862791)
Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 38.412% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/115
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862708)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 38.894% when pulling
Github user lizhanhui commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112
Overall +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/115
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862708)
Coverage increased (+0.3%) to 38.894% when pulling
Github user lizhanhui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112#discussion_r120554000
--- Diff:
example/src/main/java/org/apache/rocketmq/example/batch/SplitBatchProducer.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862588)
Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 38.748% when pulling
Github user zhouxinyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120553463
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862612)
Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 38.692% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/115
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862612)
Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 38.692% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/112
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862558)
Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 38.628% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862485)
Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 38.625% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862485)
Coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 38.625% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862406)
Coverage increased (+0.004%) to 38.681% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/11862406)
Coverage increased (+0.004%) to 38.681% when pulling
GitHub user Jaskey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/115
[Rocketmq 204]-when all brokers is offline, client still attempts to send
heartbeat
JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-204?jql=project%20%3D%20ROCKETMQ
You can
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/114
[ROCKETMQ-220]Add IT test for Filter By SQL 92
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-220
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user zhoudiqiu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120545980
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -30,12 +30,11 @@ It offers a variety of features as follows:
## Apache RocketMQ Community
*
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120535519
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -30,12 +30,11 @@ It offers a variety of features as follows:
## Apache RocketMQ Community
* [RocketMQ
Github user Jaskey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/113#discussion_r120535658
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -3,18 +3,18 @@
[