Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
@shroman @zhouxinyu @lizhanhui @vongosling
I heard that consistent hash strategy will be accomplished in 4.1.x , while
this pr has been open for months, can we accelerate it,
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
@shroman
The detail descriptions has been updated to JIRA. I will try described as
detail as possible when I create an issue in JIRA in the future.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user shroman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
@Jaskey This is a very good description, and now reviewers will understand
well your intentions :) If you clearly state your intentions in JIRA, or
discuss in the ml, it saves much time,
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
@zhouxinyu @lizhanhui @shroman @vongosling
any advice on this pr?
Since I think consistent hash can be also applied to order message shading,
the classes in this pr can be
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299)
Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299)
Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10247299)
Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.677% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899)
Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899)
Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246899)
Coverage increased (+0.05%) to 31.571% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847)
Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.673% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10246847)
Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 31.673% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561)
Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 31.603% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561)
Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 31.603% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/67
[![Coverage
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10230561)
Coverage increased (+0.08%) to 31.603% when pulling
15 matches
Mail list logo