Re: Changing Package Names (was Re: PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!))

It may bring some confusion if you will have in one package -bin-js-swf and -bin-flexjs - I see questions - what is doing this and this. We should stay with js-swf or flexjs. If you stay with the idea of copying to flexjs some thing I would be for copying js-swf, for sure not jsonly package.

Re: PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!)

Hi Piotr, just done right now thanks 2018-01-14 13:49 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Carlos, > > I'm still thinking that maybe Getting Started should be in the main menu > and Try It Now more hidden. - It's not ready yet. > > Thanks, Piotr > > 2018-01-14 13:46 GMT+01:00

Re: PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!)

Carlos, I'm still thinking that maybe Getting Started should be in the main menu and Try It Now more hidden. - It's not ready yet. Thanks, Piotr 2018-01-14 13:46 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi, if you want that I help inserting something in "Getting Started" let me >

Re: PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!)

Hi, if you want that I help inserting something in "Getting Started" let me about the text and where to insert it. You can as well insert it yourself if you want. Choose whatever you feel more confortable thanks 2018-01-12 18:29 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Alex, > >

Re: PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!)

Alex, I don't have such problems in case of jsonly package. Agree that it have to be in the Readme and Getting Started. Readme talking only about building Royale, but definitely have to have section how to use it. I'm ok with both options Flexjs and output. In case of that I'm for voting.

PLAYERGLOBAL requirement (was Re: Apache Royale website is live!!)

If you grab the jsonly package do you have the same problem? Maybe we need to change the package names. I realized the other day that I originally proposed to put 'flexjs' in the package name and hadn't gotten around to that. Then we also discussed putting output format in the package names.