Re: 0.9.2 Release

Hi, > The nightly builds have been SHA-512 since Feb 12, so yes 0.9.2 will be > SHA-512 instead of MD5. Good to hear the change has been made. [1] However I noticed that the extension on the hash file is required to be “.sha512” not “.SHA-512”. [2] I believe this is to do with how the hash

Re: 0.9.2 Release

Thank you sir! > On Mar 2, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > The nightly builds have been SHA-512 since Feb 12, so yes 0.9.2 will be > SHA-512 instead of MD5. This is just more FUD from Justin. > > -Alex > > On 3/2/18, 8:20 AM, "Dave Fisher"

Re: 0.9.2 Release

Hi Justin, > Also not everyone may be aware are some new considerations around hashes for > releases. [2] But it is easily to comply, compared to the last release you > would need to add a SHA hash file or replace the existing MD5 file with a SHA > file. (a) Alex is aware. (b) The policy

Re: 0.9.2 Release

On Mar 2, 2018 5:33 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, > I don’t know what the text in the LICENSE file means because the data does not seem to be the same. Is the LICENSE file out of date? Perhaps but unlikely as the URL in the LICENSE was changed a few weeks ago [1]. I’d

Re: 0.9.2 Release

Hi, > I don’t know what the text in the LICENSE file means because the data does > not seem to be the same. Is the LICENSE file out of date? Perhaps but unlikely as the URL in the LICENSE was changed a few weeks ago [1]. I’d guess that perhaps the URL in the LICENSE was changed but the change

Re: 0.9.2 Release

OK. I did not notice that. I don’t know what the text in the LICENSE file means because the data does not seem to be the same. Is the LICENSE file out of date? Om, can you shed some light on this? Thanks, Harbs > On Mar 2, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >

Re: 0.9.2 Release

I have no idea why you are assuming the data in MapCoords.as comes from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blank_US_map_1860.svg The data strings are different. Alex already mentioned SHA. Thanks, Harbs > On Mar 2, 2018, at

Re: 0.9.2 Release

Hi, AFAIK there’s still an outstanding license issue [1]. The license [3] links to this [4] which doesn't look compatible with the Apache 2.0 license. Also not everyone may be aware are some new considerations around hashes for releases. [2] But it is easily to comply, compared to the last

Re: 0.9.2 Release

We are almost good with the solution in case of computation. I just need go through all the components and apply it. Not sure if I will do this today. 2018-03-02 8:15 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > What else needs to be done for MDL? > > It is end of Thursday here, so no way

Re: 0.9.2 Release

What else needs to be done for MDL? It is end of Thursday here, so no way I'm going to start the release today. We need to make sure the RELEASE_NOTES are useful too. -Alex On 3/1/18, 10:59 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >I thought that I will get done with MDL stuff

Re: 0.9.2 Release

I thought that I will get done with MDL stuff before you cut that release, but if you want got ahead! Thanks, Piotr 2018-03-02 7:55 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui : > It is March. I've finished the infrastructural tasks I wanted to get > done. Before I get into the emulation