Hi Peter,
In my opinion, this is going in the right direction.
I suggest that the Flex class could link directly to the SDK reference and that
the "corresponding" Royale component could link directly to the Royale SDK
reference.
It is very helpful to have the short comment in the Royale Expres
I have a new version of the Flex to Royale comparison table. You can find
it here:
http://home.apache.org/~pent/Flex2RoyaleApp/
This table is built from the JSON output from the compiler has it scans
the ASDoc tags. I've included some new tags to document the comparison. I
still have some work to,
I just looked it over and made a small change to the trademarks section.
I'm fine with you filing it when you are back from holiday. Use the
whimsy.apache.org tool to file it and make sure you use the Reflow button
and check that it didn't munge any headers.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/11/17, 3:39 AM, "
Cool. I did not know about that tool.
Thanks!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> Tip; https://reporter.apache.org will help you with a template and some
> basic information.
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this.
>>
>> Yeah.
Tip; https://reporter.apache.org will help you with a template and some
basic information.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> Yeah. I have very limited availability this week. I will try to go over
> what you’ve done today. I could probably file it to
Thanks for working on this.
Yeah. I have very limited availability this week. I will try to go over what
you’ve done today. I could probably file it today if necessary.
If folks would like more discussion I can file it on Friday or Sunday, but
there shouldn’t be much to report. Hopefully the ne
