Re: [royale-asjs] 05/09: another sweep of flex replaced by royale per Issue #17. This is hard because we use 'flex' in 'flexUnit' and in flex box css properties

Pretty sure that Flash Builder will be looking for flex-sdk-description.xml. It might be that Flash Builder users will have to run an Ant script to fully set up their SDKs and we could use that to rename a royale-sdk-description file. Thoughts? -Alex On 10/14/17, 1:58 PM, "Harbs"

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

IMO, the -falcon- package should go away and the -falconjx- package should be the only -compiler- package. The -falcon- package was for someday providing an alternative compiler for Apache Flex. I think Royale doesn't need to spend resources on such a thing. The README's and other such files

Re: Trouble migrating app to Royale

Yes. See: https://github.com/BowlerHatLLC/asconfigc/pull/15 > On Oct 15, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > > Will have to > change something in asconfigc ?

Re: Trouble migrating app to Royale

Harbs, I thought that we will leave flex-config intact - just because of such problems. At least I did understand Alex in the github comments like that. Piotr On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 10:07 Harbs wrote: > I’m having all kinds of weird errors. > > 1: > When I try compiling

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

I agree. That was why I suggested prefixing it with ROYALE. Harbs > On Oct 15, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Idylog - Nicolas Granon > wrote: > > Isn't COMPILER_HOME too generic ? It could clash with another "compiler" (the > same for TRANSPILER_HOME) at some point in the future...

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

Are we able to merge the rename branch yet? > On Oct 14, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Harbs wrote: > > It still builds for me using ant. > > The only issue I see is that flat-ui-icons has an error in mxmlc: > [java] defaults: Error: unable to open './flex-config.xml' > > I’m